首页> 外文学位 >Francis Hutcheson's Moral Philosophy: As a System and Its Problems.
【24h】

Francis Hutcheson's Moral Philosophy: As a System and Its Problems.

机译:弗朗西斯·哈钦森的道德哲学:作为一个系统及其问题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation examines the moral philosophy of Francis Hutcheson as a system. I argue that for Hutcheson, there is a conflict rooted in our nature: we are such beings that it is in our nature to go against what is natural to us. It is natural for us to form associations and habits because we need them in order to survive and expand our rational capacity. However, it is also essential for us to break our habits and associations otherwise we cannot form the idea of moral goodness, which seems necessary for making moral judgments and cultivating moral growth.;There is a solution to resolve the conflict because for Hutcheson, perfect moral knowledge exists. It is sensible, immediate and non-propositional, but when we obtain it, we have it perfectly. My argument for the status of moral knowledge is primarily based on an interpretation of the "Moral Sense" as a metaphorical rule in which it illuminates everything in the Moral Realm. I interpret Hutcheson's transformation of the Moral Sense into Conscience as evidence that the Moral Sense/Conscience has the same function in Hutcheson's system as the Forms do in Plato's system. For Plato, the Forms are the objects of true knowledge in the Intelligible Realm that make particular statements true in the sensible realm. For Hutcheson, similarly, the Moral Sense is that which makes possible the existence of moral values.;Lastly, I argue that Hutcheson's moral knowledge can be obtained through non-discursive meditation. This is because meditation captures the decisive elements of the experience of benevolence in Hutcheson's theory: pre-reflective, non-propositional and immediate. Hutcheson's pure benevolence is analogous to Purusha in Samkhya Philosophy. It is a pre-reflective awareness where things are directly experienced without the attachment of the "I." Moreover, the meditative strategy is incorporated into Hutcheson's own writing style. Inductive argumentative style and usage of thought experiments found in the text are the strategies through which Hutcheson invites the reader to meditate and introspect.
机译:本文研究了弗朗西斯·哈钦森作为一个系统的道德哲学。我认为,对于哈奇森而言,存在着一种根植于我们本性的冲突:我们是如此的存在,以至于我们本性就是违背我们的本性。对我们来说,形成协会和习惯是很自然的,因为我们需要它们才能生存和扩大我们的理性能力。但是,对我们来说,打破习惯和结社也是至关重要的,否则我们就无法形成道德善的观念,这对于做出道德判断和培养道德成长似乎是必不可少的。解决冲突的方法是因为对于哈奇森而言,完美存在道德知识。这是明智的,直接的和非命题的,但是当我们获得它时,我们就拥有了它。我对道德知识的地位的争论主要是基于对“道德感”的一种解释,它是一种隐喻的 rule ,它阐明了道德领域中的一切。我将哈钦森从道德观念到良心的转变解释为证据,证明道德观念/良心在哈钦森系统中的作用与形式在柏拉图系统中的作用相同。对于柏拉图而言,形式是可理解领域中真实知识的对象,这些特定条件使特定陈述在明智领域中成为现实。同样地,对于哈奇森而言,道德感是使道德价值存在成为可能的道德感。最后,我认为哈奇森的道德知识可以通过非介入式冥想获得。这是因为冥想捕捉了哈奇森理论中仁爱经验的决定性因素:预反思性,非命题性和即时性。哈钦森的纯粹仁慈类似于《萨姆奇雅哲学》中的 Purusha 。这是一种反思前的意识,即无需附加“ I”即可直接体验事物。此外,冥想策略已纳入哈钦森自己的写作风格。文本中的归纳式辩论风格和思想实验的运用是哈奇森邀请读者进行沉思和反思的策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chuang, Christina Chia-Wen.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Irvine.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Irvine.;
  • 学科 Ethics.;Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号