首页> 外文学位 >The effects of goal setting on increasing physical activity behavior through a 16-week internet-delivered intervention.
【24h】

The effects of goal setting on increasing physical activity behavior through a 16-week internet-delivered intervention.

机译:通过16周的互联网干预,目标设定对增加体育锻炼行为的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The effects of goal setting on increasing physical activity (PA) levels in middle-aged female adults, through a goal-setting modification to a previously validated internet-delivered PA behavior change program was investigated. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether middle-aged female adults who complete a 16-week internet-delivered PA behavior change intervention with prescribed goal setting realized a greater change in PA behavior and improvements in cardiometabolic disease factors compared to those who completed the same intervention but without prescribed goal setting. Methods: Forty-three female participants completed the 16-week Active Living Every DayRTM (ALED) PA behavior change program, of which 21 were randomly assigned to receive a monthly progressive step goal (Goal group; +625 steps/day/month) over the 4-month period (2500 steps/day total increase). The remaining 22 participants were not assigned a goal (No Goal group), but had access to the identical behavior change features inherent within the ALED program as the Goal group. At baseline and 16-weeks, PA (pedometer) and the following caridometabolic disease variables were measured: (1) predicated VO2 peak (ml/kg/min), (2) systolic blood pressure (mmHg), (3) diastolic blood pressure (mmHg), (4) BMI (kg/m2), (5) weight (kg), (6) body fat (%), (7) lean tissue mass (%), (8) total cholesterol (mg/dL), (9) LDL cholesterol (mg/dL), (10) HDL cholesterol (mg/dL), (11) triglyceride (mg/dL), (12) fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL), (13) fasting insulin (mg/dL), and (14) waist circumference (cm). Participants logged/reported their PA for at least five of seven days per week including one weekend day. Multiple day data allowed calculation of weekly steps/day means, physical activity variability as well as weekly minimum and maximum PA. Results: At baseline, the No Goal group (active control) and the Goal group (intervention group) were similar in age and other descriptive/anthropometric characteristics with the exception of waist circumference. Participants in the No Goal group had a greater waist circumference (94.7 +/- 3.1 cm) than the Goal group participants (83.8 +/- 1.9 cm), however, body mass index, weight, and percent body fat were similar between the groups. After accounting for baseline differences, the reduction in central adiposity of 2.1 cm in the No Goal group was statistically significant (p≤0.05) when compared to the change of 1.3 cm (p=0.2) in the Goal group. Predicted aerobic fitness increased significantly and similarly in both groups after the 16-week PA behavior change program. The No Goal group increased PA by 1170 steps per day (8479+/-579 to 9649+/-579; p<0.008) from baseline compared to the Goal group who increased steps per day by 237 (8946+/-593 to 9211+/-593; p=0.87). Despite the insignificant increase in PA observed in the Goal group, the subject's least physically active day (minimum) increased by 22% (5149+/-599 to 6575+/-599 steps; p=0.019), and physically activity variability (standard deviation steps/day) decreased by 26.8% (p=0.018). Conclusions: The 16-week internet-delivered ALED behavior change program, without enhanced goal setting, increased physical activity and aerobic fitness and reduced central adiposity. However, addition of prescribed goal setting to the ALED program did not result in greater increases in physical activity or improvements in cardiometabolic disease factors, and in fact diminished the health promoting effect of ALED. Goal setting does appear to favorably influence physical activity consistency and reduce weekly inactivity. These findings suggest that continued investigation of goal setting in pedometer-based physical activity interventions is warranted.
机译:通过对先前验证的互联网传递的PA行为改变程序进行目标设定,研究了目标设定对中年成年女性增加身体活动(PA)水平的影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定与目标人群相比,以规定的目标设定完成了为期16周的互联网传播的PA行为改变干预的中年女性成年人是否实现了PA行为的更大改变并改善了心脏代谢疾病因素完成了相同的干预,但没有规定目标。方法:43名女性参与者完成了为期16周的Active Living Every DayRTM(ALED)PA行为改变计划,其中21名被随机分配以接受每月渐进式目标(目标组; +625步/日/月/月)。 4个月期间(每天增加2500步)。其余22位参与者未分配目标(无目标组),但可以使用ALED计划中与目标组相同的行为改变功能。在基线和16周时,测量PA(计步器)和以下心血管代谢疾病变量:(1)预测的VO2峰值(ml / kg / min),(2)收缩压(mmHg),(3)舒张压(mmHg),(4)BMI(kg / m2),(5)体重(kg),(6)体脂(%),(7)瘦组织质量(%),(8)总胆固醇(mg / dL ),(9)低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(mg / dL),(10)高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(mg / dL),(11)甘油三酸酯(mg / dL),(12)空腹血糖(mg / dL),(13)空腹胰岛素(mg / dL)和(14)腰围(cm)。参与者至少每周7天中有5天记录/报告其PA,包括一个周末。多日数据允许计算每周步数/天平均值,身体活动变异性以及每周最小和最大PA。结果:基线时,无目标组(积极控制)和目标组(干预组)在年龄和其他描述性/人体测量学特征上相似,除了腰围。无目标组的参与者的腰围(94.7 +/- 3.1厘米)比目标组的参与者(83.8 +/- 1.9厘米)更大,但是两组之间的体重指数,体重和体脂百分比相似。扣除基线差异后,无目标组的中央脂肪减少2.1 cm(与目标组的1.3 cm改变(p = 0.2)相比)具有统计学意义(p≤0.05)。经过16周的PA行为改变计划后,两组的预期有氧适应性均显着提高。与目标组相比,无目标组每天将步伐增加237(8946 +/- 593至9211),较基线每天增加1170步(8479 +/- 579至9649 +/- 579; p <0.008)。 +/- 593; p = 0.87)。尽管在“目标”组中观察到的PA的增加不明显,但受试者的最低体力活动天数(最少)增加了22%(5149 +/- 599至6575 +/- 599步; p = 0.019)和体力活动变异性(标准)偏差步数/天)减少了26.8%(p = 0.018)。结论:在互联网上进行的为期16周的ALED行为改变计划,没有提高目标设定,增加体育锻炼和有氧健身以及减少中央肥胖。但是,向ALED程序中添加规定的目标设置并不会导致体育活动的增加或心血管代谢疾病因素的改善,并且实际上削弱了ALED的健康促进作用。目标设定确实确实有利于影响体育锻炼的一致性并减少每周的运动量。这些发现表明,有必要对基于计步器的体育锻炼干预措施中的目标设定进行持续调查。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bischoff, Steven Austin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Wyoming.;

  • 授予单位 University of Wyoming.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 69 p.
  • 总页数 69
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号