首页> 外文学位 >Differences in Repeated Jump Performance While Wearing Lower-Body Compression Garments Versus a Placebo and Self-Selected Workout Attire.
【24h】

Differences in Repeated Jump Performance While Wearing Lower-Body Compression Garments Versus a Placebo and Self-Selected Workout Attire.

机译:穿着下半身压缩服装时重复跳跃性能的差异与安慰剂和自行选择的锻炼服装的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Extreme conditioning (EC) programs, such as those by CrossfitRTM, and Insanity(TM) have increased in popularity, possibly due their perceived benefits in health and fitness. Repeated bouts of maximal intensity exercises as found in EC programs may lead to a decrease in power that may affect an individual's ability to complete a workout. Lower body compression garments (LBCG) have the potential to delay these power decrements. Purpose: To investigate the effects of LBCG on power decrements during repeated jumps. Methods: Twelve EC individuals (5 males and 7 females) between the ages of 18 and 40 years old with an average age, height, and weight of 29.08 +/- 2.1 yearrs, 68.17 +/- 0.7 inches, and 166.1 +/- 8.0 pounds respectively, participated in this study. They performed 3 trials of 4 sets of 15-second counter movement jumps (CMJ) with 10-seconds of rest between sets, in LBCG, a placebo garment, and self-selected active wear(SSAW). The garments conditions were compared using an ANOVA, with significance set at p ≤ 0.05. Results. LBCG showed a greater conservation in power during the landing phase of the repeated jump performance. In measurements of maximal negative work participants used 268.15 + 535.65 fewer watts in LBCG than the in placebo and 283.37 + 358.11 fewer watts than in SSAW. During eccentric work the participants required 409.43 + 307.45 fewer watts in the LBCG than in the placebo, and 471.5 + 307.45 fewer watts than in the SSAW. The participants experienced a 16.1 + 1.04% smaller decrement in power during the eccentric phase in LBCG than in placebo and 4.17 + 0.41% smaller than in SSAW. When the participants wore LBCG they performed 0.18 more jumps than in placebo, and 0.34 more than in SSAW. Conclusion. The increased number of jumps performed while wearing LBCG may be attributed to a greater conservation of energy during the landing phase of the repeated jump performance test. This energy conservation may potentially help ameliorate fatigue during the latter stages of high intensity bouts of exercise.
机译:背景:极限调节(EC)程序(例如CrossfitRTM和Insanity™的那些程序)已越来越受欢迎,这可能是由于它们在健康和健身方面的好处。在EC程序中反复进行最大强度的锻炼可能会导致力量下降,从而影响个人完成锻炼的能力。下身压缩服(LBCG)可能会延迟这些功率的降低。目的:研究重复跳跃过程中LBCG对力量减少的影响。方法:年龄在18至40岁之间的十二名EC个体(男5例,女7例),平均年龄,身高和体重为29.08 +/- 2.1岁,68.17 +/- 0.7英寸和166.1 +/-分别为8.0磅。他们在LBCG,安慰剂服装和自选运动服(SSAW)中进行了4组15秒反向运动跳跃(CMJ)的试验,每组之间有10秒的休息时间。使用ANOVA比较服装条件,显着性设置为p≤0.05。结果。 LBCG在重复跳跃性能的着陆阶段显示出更大的动力守恒。在最大负功的测量中,参与者的LBCG功耗比安慰剂低268.15 + 535.65瓦,比SSAW少283.37 + 358.11瓦。在偏心工作期间,参与者的LBCG所需的功率比安慰剂少409.43 + 307.45,比SSAW少471.5 + 307.45瓦。参与者在LBCG偏心阶段的功率下降比安慰剂小16.1±1.04%,比SSAW小4.17 + 0.41%。当参与者穿着LBCG时,他们的跳跳次数比安慰剂多0.18,比SSAW多0.34。结论。穿着LBCG时执行的跳跃次数增加,可能是由于在重复跳跃性能测试的着陆阶段中能量守恒更大。这种能量节省可能有助于减轻高强度运动后期的疲劳。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tobin, Liana Rose.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.;

  • 授予单位 University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.;
  • 学科 Kinesiology.;Health sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 63 p.
  • 总页数 63
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号