首页> 外文学位 >Nature reserve selection and design problems solved using heuristic concentration.
【24h】

Nature reserve selection and design problems solved using heuristic concentration.

机译:自然保护区的选择和设计问题通过启发式解决。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Several problems of nature reserve selection and design are approached using an exact method and Heuristic Concentration (HC). Some of these problems have been formulated previously, such as the Maximal Multiple-Representation Species Problem (MMRSP), the Maximal Expected Covering Species Problem (MEXCSP) and the Probabilistic Maximal Covering Species Problem (PMCSP).; Other problems are extensions of previous linear programs. The External Border - Species Covering Problem (EBSCP) is a combination of the Maximal Covering Species Problem (MCSP) and the land acquisition problem, which tries to select parcels of land that are contiguous and compact. The Maximal Covering Percent Area Reservation (MCPAR) problem is a maximal covering modification of the Percent Area Reservation problem that is traditionally formulated in a set-covering setting. Finally, the Multi-Objective Buffering-Maximal Covering Species Problem (MOB-MCSP) trades off between protection in core zones that are surrounded by buffer areas and protection in the entire reserve network.; In the MMRSP and the PMCSP, HC solved much more quickly than LP-IP in several cases and was competitive in the rest. Furthermore, the objective function value gap between the heuristic and exact method was very small.; In the MEXCSP, there is no known linear formulation, so a linear approximation was used for comparison. HC found better solutions than the linear approximation in 6 cases and found solutions at least as good in all but one case.; In the EBSCP and the MCPAR problem, there were many instances in which the exact method did not terminate in the allowed 12 hours. HC, however, finished in less than 25 minutes for the EBSCP and approximately an hour and 40 minutes for the MCPAR problem. In both problems, HC often found better solutions than LP-IP in many cases when LP-IP did not terminate in under 12 hours, and near-optimal solutions otherwise.; For the MOB-MCSP, LP-IP required substantial branching and bounding. HC solved much more quickly, but with questionable solution quality. However, it is believed that with further modification HC could prove a useful method for this problem.
机译:使用精确的方法和启发式浓度(HC)解决了自然保护区选择和设计的几个问题。其中一些问题先前已经提出,例如最大多重表示物种问题(MMRSP),最大期望覆盖物种问题(MEXCSP)和概率最大覆盖物种问题(PMCSP)。其他问题是先前线性程序的扩展。外部边界-物种覆盖问题(EBSCP)是最大覆盖物种问题(MCSP)和土地征用问题的结合,试图选择连续且紧凑的土地。最大覆盖百分比保留区(MCPAR)问题是对百分比保留区域问题的最大覆盖修改,该问题通常是在集覆盖设置中提出的。最后,多目标缓冲最大覆盖物种问题(MOB-MCSP)在被缓冲区包围的核心区域的保护与整个备用网络的保护之间进行权衡。在MMRSP和PMCSP中,HC在某些情况下比LP-IP更快地解决,在其余情况下则具有竞争力。此外,启发式方法和精确方法之间的目标函数值差距很小。在MEXCSP中,没有已知的线性公式,因此使用线性近似进行比较。 HC在6种情况下找到了比线性近似更好的解决方案,并且发现除一种情况外,其他解决方案至少都一样好。在EBSCP和MCPAR问题中,很多情况下,确切的方法在允许的12小时内没有终止。但是,对于EBSCP,HC在不到25分钟的时间内就完成了,而对于MCPAR问题,HC在不到一小时40分钟的时间内就完成了。在这两个问题中,在许多情况下,当LP-IP都没有在12小时内终止时,HC通常会找到比LP-IP更好的解决方案,否则,将是接近最佳的解决方案。对于MOB-MCSP,LP-IP需要大量分支和边界。 HC解决速度更快,但解决方案质量令人怀疑。但是,可以相信,通过进一步的修饰,HC可以证明是解决此问题的一种有用方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mizumori, Michelle.;

  • 作者单位

    The Johns Hopkins University.;

  • 授予单位 The Johns Hopkins University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Environmental.; Operations Research.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 143 p.
  • 总页数 143
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境污染及其防治;运筹学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号