首页> 外文学位 >Manufacturing system testing measurement and management process.
【24h】

Manufacturing system testing measurement and management process.

机译:制造系统测试的测量和管理过程。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation will address the key question of how a test engineer measures, manages, and improves the quality of a system level manufacturing test process. The question is complicated due to the lack of clear metrics to drive improvements to the test process. It is an interesting question because of the way it blends test engineering and process management techniques. This dissertation will examine the question using a combination of several process management tools and test engineering techniques. The management processes include Total Quality Management, the Balanced Scorecard, and the Theory of Constraints.; The methodology used to address the issues identified, follows the standard Total Quality Management six-sigma process of Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control. The define phase will answer the question "How do you know if you have a good test process?" This is achieved by defining the stakeholder requirements for the test process. A balanced scorecard for the test process will be the result of the define phase. The measurement phase will outline how these requirements are measured. This includes defining test coverage at the system level, and creating models that calculate the quality, capacity, and cost impact of the test process. The cost models showed that a significant cost is related to test development and support. The analysis phase combines the Balanced Scorecard and the Theory of Constraints to identify the core conflict leading to the low efficiency of the test process. The core conflict identified is a cost versus quality tradeoff.; The improve phase seeks to eliminate this core conflict by proposing that the test process be designed as tool for quality improvement, not just a quality screen. This approach has several implications on how systems are tested and requires a more communicative process. In combination with the need to reduce the cost of test development, these implications lead the author to propose a new Built in Self Test standard for system testing. The control phase will therefore, discuss the projected results including a test time saving of 50% and a cost saving of a similar proportion.
机译:本文将解决测试工程师如何测量,管理和提高系统级制造测试过程质量的关键问题。由于缺乏明确的指标来推动测试流程的改进,因此问题变得复杂。这是一个有趣的问题,因为它结合了测试工程和过程管理技术。本文将结合几种过程管理工具和测试工程技术来研究这个问题。管理过程包括全面质量管理,平衡计分卡和约束理论。解决所发现问题的方法遵循标准的全面质量管理六标准差定义,定义,测量,分析,改进和控制。定义阶段将回答问题“您如何知道您是否有良好的测试过程?”这是通过定义测试过程的涉众需求来实现的。测试阶段的平衡计分卡将是定义阶段的结果。测量阶段将概述如何测量这些要求。这包括在系统级别定义测试范围,以及创建模型来计算测试过程的质量,容量和成本影响。成本模型表明,大量成本与测试开发和支持有关。分析阶段结合了平衡计分卡和约束理论来确定导致测试流程效率低下的核心冲突。确定的核心冲突是成本与质量的权衡。改进阶段通过建议将测试过程设计为质量改进的工具,而不仅仅是质量筛选,以消除这种核心冲突。这种方法对如何测试系统有一些影响,并且需要一个更具沟通性的过程。结合降低测试开发成本的需求,这些含义使作者提出了用于系统测试的新的内置自测标准。因此,控制阶段将讨论预计的结果,包括节省50%的测试时间和相似比例的成本。

著录项

  • 作者

    Williams, David Franklin.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Engineering Electronics and Electrical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 152 p.
  • 总页数 152
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 无线电电子学、电信技术;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号