首页> 外文学位 >Managing the introduction of quality improvement at Point Park University (Pennsylvania).
【24h】

Managing the introduction of quality improvement at Point Park University (Pennsylvania).

机译:在Point Park University(宾夕法尼亚州)管理引入质量改进措施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quality in American higher education has become a greater concern since the 1980s. This was driven largely by several reports commissioned by the federal government that called into question the effectiveness of higher education. As costs rose and studies showed that students were graduating from college less prepared to enter the workforce, the federal government began to question why it was providing substantial support for the enterprise through grants and guaranteed student loans.; The response from higher education was to step up the self-appraisal efforts developed by the academy to keep government regulators out. All six regional accrediting agencies and many discipline related accrediting agencies began to place a greater emphasis on creating student learning objectives and methods to measure the learning outcomes. There was also a greater emphasis on measuring all aspects of institutional effectiveness. The systematic process of measuring performance to improve outcomes is consistent with a quality framework. By producing this data, institutions can demonstrate levels of quality. In those areas determined to be low quality, institutions are encouraged to develop interventions that will improve the quality of the learning or service processes.; There are institutions throughout the country that are beginning to focus on the quality mandate from their accrediting agency. Those institutions without a quality framework in place have ten years or less to get one in place. The Total Quality Management (TQM) and Learning Outcomes Assessment frameworks are presented. Most important though, before implementing a quality framework, is an understanding of the culture of the organization. A framework and methodology is presented for conducting a qualitative culture assessment. The findings from a qualitative culture assessment at an institution are presented along with recommendations for addressing the findings.
机译:自1980年代以来,美国高等教育的质量已成为人们越来越关注的问题。这主要是受到联邦政府委托的几份报告的质疑,这些报告对高等教育的有效性提出了质疑。随着成本上升,研究表明学生从大学毕业后就没有准备加入劳动力大军,联邦政府开始质疑为什么它通过补助金和有保证的学生贷款为企业提供大量支持。高等教育的回应是加大学院的自我评估工作,以使政府监管机构脱离。所有六个地区认证机构和许多与学科相关的认证机构都开始更加重视建立学生的学习目标和方法来衡量学习成果。还更加强调衡量机构效力的所有方面。衡量绩效以改善成果的系统过程与质量框架一致。通过产生这些数据,机构可以证明质量水平。在那些被确定为质量低下的领域,鼓励机构制定干预措施,以提高学习或服务过程的质量。全国各地的机构开始关注其认证机构的质量要求。那些没有适当质量框架的机构,只有不到十年的时间就可以建立一个质量框架。介绍了全面质量管理(TQM)和学习成果评估框架。但是,在实施质量框架之前,最重要的是对组织文化的理解。提出了进行定性文化评估的框架和方法。介绍机构对文化进行定性评估的结果,并提出解决这些问题的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hennigan, Paul.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Pennsylvania.;

  • 授予单位 University of Pennsylvania.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.; Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 116 p.
  • 总页数 116
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号