首页> 外文学位 >The relationship between deliberate practice and reading ability
【24h】

The relationship between deliberate practice and reading ability

机译:刻意练习与阅读能力之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Many students are not prepared to meet the literacy demands of college and career as defined by the Common Core State Standards (2010). Literacy researchers have struggled to define the frequency and type of reading practice necessary to nurture the development of reading ability. The principles of deliberate practice provide a theoretical framework that could describe the type of practice necessary to develop expertise in reading. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between deliberate practice and reading ability. In this study, an educational technology, Learning Oasis, was used to deliver deliberate practice and monitor change in student reading ability over time. The hypotheses were that participants that engaged in more deliberate practice, as operationalized in this study, would experience more rapid growth and achieve higher levels of reading ability. Participants in this study (N = 1,369) ranged from grades one through twelve and were from a suburban school district in Mississippi. Each participant had at least three measurement occasions separated by at least three months each. The Lexile Framework for Reading was used to estimate participant reading ability during this research. Given the longitudinal nature of the data, a multilevel model was used to explore individual change over time. A negative exponential functional form was determined to best model change in participant reading ability over time. The results showed that, on average, participants that engaged in more deliberate practice (i.e., targeted practice with immediate feedback completed intensely over a long period of time) grew more rapidly and reached a higher ability level than participants that completed less deliberate practice. Implications for educators, educational technology designers, and researchers are discussed along with potential future areas of research.
机译:许多学生不准备满足通用核心州标准(2010)所定义的大学和职业素养要求。识字研究人员一直在努力确定培养阅读能力发展所必需的阅读实践的频率和类型。故意练习的原则提供了一个理论框架,可以描述培养阅读专业知识所必需的练习类型。这项研究的目的是探讨刻意练习与阅读能力之间的关系。在这项研究中,一种教育技术“学习绿洲”被用于提供有针对性的练习并监测学生阅读能力随时间的变化。假设是,如本研究中所实施的那样,参与更深层次的实践的参与者将经历更快的成长并获得更高水平的阅读能力。这项研究的参与者(N = 1,369)的年龄从1年级到12年级不等,来自密西西比州的郊区学区。每个参与者至少有三个测量场合,每个间隔至少三个月。在这项研究中,Lexile阅读框架用于估计参与者的阅读能力。考虑到数据的纵向性质,使用了多层次模型来探索随时间变化的个体变化。负指数函数形式被确定为最佳模型,以随着时间的推移改变参与者的阅读能力。结果表明,平均而言,参加较深思熟虑的参与者(即在很长一段时间内强烈完成即时反馈的有针对性的练习)的成长和达到的能力水平要高于完成较少深思熟虑的参与者的能力水平。讨论了对教育者,教育技术设计师和研究人员的影响以及潜在的未来研究领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hanlon, Sean Thomas.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Educational psychology.;Educational technology.;Reading instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 282 p.
  • 总页数 282
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号