首页> 外文学位 >Rearrangements: Participation and Politics at the Dia Art Foundation, 1988-89.
【24h】

Rearrangements: Participation and Politics at the Dia Art Foundation, 1988-89.

机译:重新安排:Dia Art Foundation的“参与和政治”,1988-89年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation deals with audience experience in contemporary participatory art. It approaches this topic both in terms of the changing conditions that produce certain forms of audience experience, and in terms of how artists, critics, and institutions historically have represented audience experience within narratives about art's social import. These questions inform my historical case study of two projects: artists' collaborative Group Material's "Democracy" and artist Martha Rosler's "If You Lived Here...", both held at the Dia Art Foundation in New York City in 1988--89. In these participatory projects, the artists combined art exhibitions with public "town-hall" meetings to address pressing social issues, including AIDS, homelessness, and problems with New York's public education system.;On the basis of extensive archival documentation of "Democracy" and "If You Lived Here...", I analyze how the idea of art's social engagement through audience participation configured relationships between institutional employees, the artists, and their audiences. I argue that Group Material and Rosler's projects are emblematic of a shift in which the rise of audience participation in contemporary American art rendered relationships between leftist artists and major art institutions less confrontational and more collaborative over the course of the late '80s and early '90s then they had been in the late '60s and '70s. These newly collaborative relationships revolved in particular around an equation of art's political impact with its pedagogical role for the audience, a correlation in which both activist artists and major art institutions could invest. I argue that since the 1980s this model of politics-as-pedagogy has become fundamental to the funding, exhibition, and reception of contemporary art, because of the ways in which it has helped artists and art institutions navigate an increasingly austere and politically inhospitable cultural environment.
机译:本文主要探讨当代参与艺术的受众体验。它从产生某些形式的受众体验的不断变化的条件以及艺术家,评论家和机构在历史上是如何在关于艺术的社会意义的叙事中代表受众体验的角度来探讨这一主题的。这些问题为我对两个项目的历史案例研究提供了信息:艺术家合作的Group Material的“民主”和艺术家Martha Rosler的“如果您住在这里...”,两者均于1988--89年在纽约的Dia艺术基金会举行。在这些参与性项目中,艺术家将艺术展览与公开的“市政厅”会议相结合,以解决紧迫的社会问题,包括艾滋病,无家可归以及纽约公共教育系统的问题。;在广泛的“民主”档案文献的基础上和“如果您住在这里...”,我分析了通过观众参与来进行艺术的社会参与的想法如何配置了机构雇员,艺术家及其观众之间的关系。我认为Group Material和Rosler的项目标志着一种转变,在这种转变中,随着80年代后期和90年代初的发展,观众对美国当代艺术的参与的增加使左派艺术家与主要艺术机构之间的关系不再产生对抗性,而是更具协作性那时他们在60年代和70年代后期。这些新的合作关系尤其围绕着艺术的政治影响力及其对观众的教育作用等方面展开,激进主义艺术家和主要艺术机构都可以进行投资。我认为,自1980年代以来,这种政治即教育学模式已成为资助当代艺术,展览和接受当代艺术的基础,这是因为它已帮助艺术家和艺术机构应对日益严峻和政治上荒凉的文化。环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rounthwaite, Vanessa Adair.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Art history.;Art education.;Performing arts.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 341 p.
  • 总页数 341
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号