首页> 外文学位 >Great neighborhoods: The livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America.
【24h】

Great neighborhoods: The livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in urban North America.

机译:大社区:北美城市高密度社区的宜居性和形态。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Alongside sustainability, the concept of livability is one of the driving visions in early 21st Century city planning. The term is widely used in practice but lacks convergence on a single definition due to its relativistic nature and its use as an ensemble concept that aggregates a variety of ideas about place-based quality of life. This dissertation explores the concept of livability through a grounded theory approach to its definitional attributes, and then uses these findings to assess the livability concerns and morphology of twelve case study neighborhoods in the United States and Canada. From a review of historical, academic, theoretical and practical literature on the term, a set of livability dimensions has been determined that can be used in assessing livability and focusing attention on local challenges in dense urban neighborhoods. These include: sufficient density to support services, walkability, balanced transportation modes, mixed land uses, balanced and affordable housing, well-programmed leisure space amenities, a sense of place and knowledge about local challenges. This research adopts a place-based approach and has found that issues of everyday life and the functioning of place for daily needs are at the heart of livability practice.; Twelve dense neighborhoods have been grouped historically into traditional neighborhoods prior to the introduction of land use planning and planning-era neighborhoods of the 20th Century. Each group has six neighborhoods that show a regional and form sampling of neighborhood types. A number of research findings come forth to suggest key differences in livability, daily life and urban form. The case study research has found that neighborhoods are nuanced in how they provide for local quality of life, with each offering a different set of amenities and means for achieving local livability. Some of the neighborhoods were able to meet a greater number of livability dimensions. Others that offered less choice in housing, transportation mode, retail and amenity choice were less successful. The study suggests that high urban housing and population densities can be reached through a variety of urban form models and that the eight selected livability dimensions are an appropriate means of assessing local neighborhood livability.
机译:除可持续性外,宜居性概念是21世纪初城市规划的驱动愿景之一。该术语在实践中被广泛使用,但是由于其相对论性及其用作整体概念的集合,该概念集合了有关基于地点的生活质量的各种观点,因此在单一定义上缺乏统一性。本文通过扎实的理论方法探讨宜居性的定义属性,然后利用这些发现来评估美国和加拿大的十二个案例研究社区的宜居性问题和形态。通过对该术语的历史,学术,理论和实践文献的回顾,已经确定了一套宜居性维度,可用于评估宜居性并将注意力集中在人口稠密的城市社区中的本地挑战上。其中包括:足够的密度以支持服务,步行,平衡的交通方式,混合土地使用,平衡且负担得起的住房,编程完善的休闲空间设施,位置感以及对当地挑战的了解。这项研究采用了基于场所的方法,并且发现日常生活和场所功能的日常需求是宜居性实践的核心。在引入土地使用规划和20世纪规划时代的社区之前,历史上将12个人口稠密的社区分为传统社区。每个组有六个邻域,分别显示一个区域和邻域类型的抽样。大量研究发现表明,宜居性,日常生活和城市形态方面存在关键差异。案例研究发现,社区在如何提供当地生活质量方面存在细微差别,每个社区都提供了一套不同的便利设施和手段来实现当地的宜居性。一些社区能够满足更多的宜居性要求。其他在住房,交通方式,零售和便利设施选择上提供较少选择的人则不太成功。该研究表明,可以通过各种城市形态模型来达到较高的城市住房和人口密度,并且选择的八个宜居性维度是评估当地社区宜居性的适当手段。

著录项

  • 作者

    Larice, Michael Angelo.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 Landscape Architecture.; Architecture.; Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 486 p.
  • 总页数 486
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 地下建筑;建筑科学;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号