首页> 外文学位 >Private Rights of Action Under Free Trade Agreement Implementation Acts.
【24h】

Private Rights of Action Under Free Trade Agreement Implementation Acts.

机译:《自由贸易协定执行法》规定的私人诉权。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis examines the availability of private rights of action in the U.S. courts under U.S. Free Trade Agreement Implementation Acts (FTA IAs), including the legislation implementing the WTO Agreement. The central question is: Do private parties have the right to specifically enforce FTA IAs against the United States, even though private parties generally do not have the right to enforce the United States' international trade obligations? That is, do private parties have the right to indirectly force the United States to comply with its international trade obligations by suing to enforce the domestic laws enacted to implement those international obligations? If so, what is the scope of that right?;This thesis concludes: (1) private rights of action exist under all of the FTA IAs currently in effect; (2) FTA IA causes of action allow private parties to indirectly enforce only certain provisions of each free trade agreement, not the entire agreement; and (3) if successfully prosecuted, FTA IA causes of action allow private parties to invoke the remedial power of U.S. courts to indirectly enjoin the United States from violating its international obligations. In practical terms, this means that domestic importers, foreign manufacturers, and even domestic employers seeking free trade agreement visas, in certain instances, need not rely on their respective government to initiate international dispute resolution proceedings or invoke investor-state arbitration remedies. Instead, private parties injured by the United States' conduct may seek relief directly in the U.S. courts.
机译:本论文研究了美国法院根据《美国自由贸易协定实施法》(FTA IAs)所享有的私人诉讼权,包括实施《 WTO协定》的立法。中心问题是:尽管私人团体通常无权执行美国的国际贸易义务,但私人团体是否有权对美国强制执行自由贸易协定IA?也就是说,私人当事方是否有权通过起诉执行为履行这些国际义务而制定的国内法律,来间接地迫使美国遵守其国际贸易义务?如果是这样,该权利的范围是什么?;本文的结论是:(1)现行的所有FTA IA都存在私人诉权。 (2)FTA IA的诉讼因由允许私人当事方仅间接执行每项自由贸易协定的某些规定,而不是整个协定; (3)如果成功起诉,FTA IA的诉讼理由将允许私人当事方援引美国法院的补救权,以间接禁止美国违反其国际义务。实际上,这意味着在某些情况下,国内进口商,外国制造商,甚至是寻求自由贸易协定签证的国内雇主,都不必依靠其各自的政府来启动国际争议解决程序或援引投资者与国家之间的仲裁补救措施。相反,受美国行为伤害的私人当事方可直接在美国法院寻求救济。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bryant, Nohl Patrick.;

  • 作者单位

    The George Washington University.;

  • 授予单位 The George Washington University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 LL.M.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:42:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号