首页> 外文学位 >Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy Regimes and Population Health: Assessing Causal Loops.
【24h】

Comprehensive Tobacco Control Policy Regimes and Population Health: Assessing Causal Loops.

机译:全面的烟草控制政策制度和人口健康:评估因果关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Tobacco products remain among the most controversial consumer products of all time: cigarettes are the only legal product that, when used as intended, are lethal. The global and individual burden attributable to the primary use of tobacco, or secondary or tertiary exposure to cigarette smoke, whether measured by morbidity, mortality, or economic costs, is substantial. With the combined efforts of scientific research, public health and policy advocates, the image and use of tobacco products has undergone profound change. However, while much has been achieved regarding the attitudinal, behavioral, and policy changes needed to diminish the individual, social, and economic costs of tobacco use, much remains to be yet accomplished if these adverse tobacco use impacts are to be further curtailed. There is considerable evidence that tobacco use is becoming highly concentrated in lower socio-economic groups and that the rate of decline in smoking is slowing. Further, as the tobacco epidemic emerges in the developing world, there is considerable interest line applying the lessons learned in industrialized countries to developing countries, thereby truncating the tobacco epidemic and forgoing some of the enormous costs in countries least able to absorb such costs.;The unifying theme of the present work is an integration of the public health and political science perspectives on tobacco control so as to establish a more comprehensive framework of the underlying factors and elements interrelating tobacco use and tobacco control policy. A substantial challenge in developing such a framework is the complexity of the relationship between the two primary outcomes of interest. The relationships, including interdependencies and feedback mechanisms, are much more accurately characterized by a causal loop. This work presents an overview of the tobacco epidemic, a review of two very different literatures with different perspectives on the tobacco epidemic (public health literature and political and policy science), an empirical policy history analysis integrating the political and policy science viewpoint with the public health perspective on the evolution of the tobacco epidemic, and two quantitative analyses alternately supporting the interdependence and complex temporal relationship between tobacco control policy adoption and population health outcomes as well as the importance of societally-derived factors. An integrated conceptual model based on the causal loops of tobacco control policy and tobacco-related population health is then presented that incorporates the realms of population, governmental, judicial, public health, tobacco industry and other subsystems, and scientific communities. However, while this framework does assimilate the key elements and forces elucidated during the course of this work and integrates the political and policy science with the public health perspective, in truth this framework likely elicits more questions than it answers. The research questions and agendas and metrics proposed highlight both the strengths and deficiencies of the two perspectives.
机译:烟草制品一直是有史以来最有争议的消费产品之一:香烟是唯一合法使用的具有法定致死性的合法产品。不论是发病率,死亡率还是经济成本,主要归因于烟草的初次使用或二次或三次接触卷烟烟雾所造成的全球和个人负担是巨大的。在科学研究,公共卫生和政策倡导者的共同努力下,烟草制品的形象和使用发生了深刻的变化。但是,尽管在减少烟草使用的个人,社会和经济成本所需的态度,行为和政策变化方面已取得了很多成就,但要进一步减少这些不利的烟草使用影响,还有很多工作要做。有大量证据表明,烟草使用正高度集中在较低的社会经济群体中,并且吸烟率下降的速度正在减缓。此外,随着烟草流行在发展中国家的出现,将工业化国家吸取的经验教训应用到发展中国家有很大的兴趣线,从而削减了烟草流行,并在最无力承担此类费用的国家放弃了一些巨额费用。本工作的统一主题是整合公共卫生和政治科学对烟草控制的观点,以便为与烟草使用和烟草控制政策相关的基本因素和要素建立更全面的框架。开发这样一个框架的一个重大挑战是所关注的两个主要成果之间关系的复杂性。包括相互依存关系和反馈机制的关系通过因果循环来更准确地表征。这项工作概述了烟草流行,回顾了两种对烟草流行有不同观点的非常不同的文献(公共卫生文献以及政治和政策科学),对政治和政策科学观点与公众进行了整合的实证政策历史分析关于烟草流行演变的健康观点,以及两个定量分析,交替地支持烟草控制政策的采用与人口健康结果之间以及相互关系和复杂的时间关系,以及社会因素的重要性。然后提出了一个基于烟草控制政策与烟草相关的人口健康因果循环的综合概念模型,该模型纳入了人口,政府,司法,公共卫生,烟草业和其他子系统以及科学界的领域。但是,尽管此框架确实吸收了在此工作过程中阐明的关键要素和力量,并将政治和政策科学与公共卫生观点相结合,但实际上,此框架可能引起更多的问题,而不是答案。提出的研究问题,议程和指标突出了这两种观点的优点和缺点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Frisbee, Stephanie J.;

  • 作者单位

    West Virginia University.;

  • 授予单位 West Virginia University.;
  • 学科 Public policy.;Public health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号