首页> 外文学位 >Economic interests in the domestic politics of war: Evidence from U.S. decisions to go to war with Iraq in 1991 and 2003.
【24h】

Economic interests in the domestic politics of war: Evidence from U.S. decisions to go to war with Iraq in 1991 and 2003.

机译:国内战争政治中的经济利益:美国于1991年和2003年决定与伊拉克交战的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Do a nation's commercial interests promote peace? Do those that stand to profit from war support aggressive state behavior? Or, do heterogeneous economic actors share similar preferences over the use of force? This dissertation reexamines these classic issues with rigorous theory, modern methods, and innovative data.;In particular, each chapter of the dissertation uses an initiation of military action by the U.S. government to evaluate key links in the causal chain connecting individual economic interests with state behavior. I show that, in the U.S.-Iraq Wars of 1991 and 2003, war had strong distributional consequences that varied by economic sector, that these consequences affected individual preferences, and that the economic interests of constituents influenced congressional voting---through the activity of political organizations.;In order to explain how and why actors from the same country have different economic interests in interstate disputes, I weave together international trade theory, an asset theory of individual interests, and the bargaining model of war. That is, I use insights from trade theory to explain why wars typically affect sectors differently, asset theory to explain why sectoral outcomes are translated to individuals; and the bargaining model to show that economic interests matter for individuals and politicians even if they may face strategic incentives to misrepresent their resolve.;Each of my key claims is supported by careful empirical analysis. I conduct event studies of the 1991 Gulf War and the Iraq War of 2003 using stock market data to provide detailed information about how the consequences of war differ across sectors. In addition, I show that the results of my event studies are also politically relevant. Specifically, the sector-level variation in the costs and benefits of war that I identify helps explain public support for the war with Iraq in 2003. And, campaign contributions from political action committees representing "winning" and "losing" sectors, classified by the event study---predict congressional votes authorizing the use of force in 1991. Taken together, the results demonstrate that economic interests matter in the formulation of security policy preferences in at least two major U.S. wars, and, I argue, others as well.
机译:一个国家的商业利益是否促进了和平?那些从战争中获利的人是否支持侵略性国家行为?还是,异质经济参与者在使用武力方面有相似的偏好?本文以严谨的理论,现代的方法和创新的数据重新审视了这些经典问题。特别是,论文的每一章都使用了美国政府的军事行动来评估将个人经济利益与国家联系起来的因果链中的关键环节。行为。我的研究表明,在1991年和2003年的美伊战争中,战争具有很强的分配后果,这种后果会因经济部门而异,这些后果影响个人的偏好,三方成员的经济利益会通过国会的活动而影响国会投票。为了解释同一国家的行为者在州际争端中如何以及为何具有不同的经济利益,我将国际贸易理论,个人利益资产理论和战争谈判模型结合在一起。也就是说,我使用贸易理论的见解来解释为什么战争通常会以不同的方式影响部门,资产理论来解释为什么将部门结果转化为个人;讨价还价模型表明,即使个人和政客可能面临战略动机误解其决心,经济利益也很重要。;我的每一个主要主张都得到了认真的经验分析的支持。我使用股票市场数据对1991年海湾战争和2003年伊拉克战争进行了事件研究,以提供有关战争后果在各个部门之间的差异的详细信息。此外,我证明了我的事件研究的结果在政治上也具有相关性。具体而言,我确定的部门在战争成本和收益方面的差异有助于解释公众对2003年与伊拉克战争的支持。此外,代表“胜利”和“失败”部门的政治行动委员会的竞选捐款按事件研究---预测1991年将授权使用武力的国会投票权。综上所述,结果表明,在至少两次美国大战中,经济利益与安全政策偏好的制定息息相关。

著录项

  • 作者

    Seljan, Samuel Sierra.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, San Diego.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, San Diego.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 216 p.
  • 总页数 216
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号