首页> 外文学位 >Village-scale practices and water sources in indigenous Mexico after the neoliberalizing of social property.
【24h】

Village-scale practices and water sources in indigenous Mexico after the neoliberalizing of social property.

机译:新自由化社会财产后,墨西哥土著居民的村级实践和水源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

To establish whether social property villages (" nucleos agrarios") in indigenous, well-watered parts of Mexico are maintaining the same degree of village-scale control of water sources that they practiced before the neoliberal land tenure reforms of the 1990s, three sources of data were investigated in two regions: the Huasteca of San Luis Potosi state (home to indigenous Teenek, Nahua, and Pame residents, as well as non-indigenous people), and the Sierra Norte of Oaxaca state (home to indigenous Zapotec and Chinantec residents, and a smaller number of non-indigenous people). The three data sources were: 1. Archival documents at state offices of the National Agrarian Registry (Registro Agrario Nacional, or RAN); 2. Participatory research mapping (PRM) data acquired in fifteen villages, with the author as sole academic researcher in one of these (the Zapotec nucleo of Talea de Castro); 3. GIS (geodata) analysis of water sources (springs) and land tenure zones in both regions, encompassing about 460 social property nucleos as well as private and public lands.;Neither spatially-defined ownership of land where water resources are located, nor conceptual rights and obligations (enacted through local practices), were found to have undergone extraordinary changes in the two decades since the neoliberal reforms were initiated. However, these reforms were found to have played a key role in the gradual shift in legal and practical emphasis away from a fusion of village and individual attachments to water sources (regardless of legal or locally-defined land tenure), and toward a simplified, spatially unambiguous distinction between village and individual land units, linked to a nationwide program of water rights concessions which favor the individual and the state over the village. This shift in emphasis is being successfully resisted in many villages, particularly in indigenous ones. This resistance often takes the form of creative engagement with state initiatives such as the 1993-2006 land surveying and certification program PROCEDE and its successor FANAR. Nevertheless, village orientation toward water partly depends on de facto, orally transmitted local practices which will vanish in some villages during the next several decades.
机译:为了确定墨西哥土著,水源充足地区的社会财产村庄(“核仁”)是否保持与1990年代新自由主义土地保有权改革之前实行的村庄规模的水源控制水平相同的三个来源,数据在两个地区进行了调查:圣路易斯波托西州Huasteca(土著Teenek,纳瓦族和Pame居民以及非土著居民的住所)和瓦哈卡州Sierra Norte(土著Zapotec和Chinantec居民的住所) ,以及数量较少的非土著居民)。这三个数据来源是:1.国家土地注册处(Registro Agrario Nacional或RAN)国家机关的档案文件; 2.在十五个村庄中获得的参与性研究绘图数据(PRM),作者是其中一个村庄(Talea de Castro的Zapotec核仁)的唯一学术研究者; 3.对这两个区域的水源(泉水)和土地保有权区进行GIS(地理数据)分析,涵盖约460个社会财产核能以及私人和公共土地。人们发现,自新自由主义改革开始以来的二十年中,概念上的权利和义务(通过当地做法制定)已经发生了非凡的变化。但是,发现这些改革在法律和实践重点的逐步转变中发挥了关键作用,从乡村和个人附属物的融合转变为水源(无论法律或当地定义的土地保有期限如何),并逐渐转向简化,村庄和个人土地单位之间在空间上的明确区分,与全国范围内的水权让步方案相联系,后者使个人和国家优先于村庄。在许多村庄,特别是在土著村庄,成功克服了这种重心转移。这种抵制通常采取创造性参与国家倡议的形式,例如1993-2006年土地测量和认证计划PROCEDE及其后继者FANAR。然而,村庄对水的定向在某种程度上取决于事实上的,口头传播的当地做法,这些做法将在未来几十年中消失在某些村庄。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kelly, John H.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Geography.;Latin American Studies.;Water Resource Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 421 p.
  • 总页数 421
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号