首页> 外文学位 >Bearing witness: Should journalists testify at the International War Crimes Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia?
【24h】

Bearing witness: Should journalists testify at the International War Crimes Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia?

机译:见证人:记者是否应在前南斯拉夫国际战争罪行法庭作证?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia has had more than a dozen journalists testify in its proceedings. This thesis explores the role of journalists in reporting from Bosnia, their influence on the public and policy makers, the idea of the journalist as global citizen, the influence of globalization and the human rights movement on conflict reporting, and the ethical questions---including the perceived need for journalists to maintain objectivity and neutrality---that confront war correspondents in deciding whether to testify. The focus of the thesis is the Randal decision from the ICTY in which the issue of compelling a journalist to testify through the use of a subpoena was challenged in 2002. The Tribunal's Appeals Chamber granted qualified privilege to war correspondents thus establishing a new precedent within international law. The decision also prompted new thinking about a global concept of media freedom based on a public interest privilege.
机译:前南斯拉夫问题国际刑事法庭在其诉讼中有十多名记者作证。本文探讨了记者在波斯尼亚的报道中的作用,他们对公众和政策制定者的影响,记者是全球公民的观念,全球化和人权运动对冲突报道的影响以及道德问题-包括认为记者需要保持客观性和中立性,这是战争记者在决定是否作证时所面对的。论文的重点是前南问题国际法庭的Randal决定,在该决定中,在2002年对通过传票来迫使记者作证的问题提出了质疑。法庭的上诉分庭给予战地记者以充分的特权,从而在国际上树立了新的先例法。该决定还引发了对基于公共利益特权的全球媒体自由概念的新思考。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beattie, Sherri J.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Journalism.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 M.J.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 218 p.
  • 总页数 218
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 新闻学、新闻事业;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号