首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of record linkage and measurement error in cohort mortality studies.
【24h】

Assessment of record linkage and measurement error in cohort mortality studies.

机译:队列死亡率研究中记录链接和测量误差的评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Epidemiological studies are designed to investigate disease causation through observational study of human population groups. The overall statistical goal of an epidemiological study is accuracy and precision in estimation; that is, to estimate the value of the parameter of interest with as little error as possible. In addition to random errors, epidemiologic studies may involve systematic error which undermines their validity. Record linkage error and measurement error are two common errors that occur in epidemiological studies.; In this thesis, we study the impact of linkage errors on estimates of various epidemiological indicators of risk such as relative risk regression model parameters and standard mortality ratios. We describe a method to adjust the biases in the indicators of risk in the presence of linkage errors. To explore the impact of record linkage errors in cohort mortality studies in more detail, we conduct a simulation study based on actual data from the National Dose Registry of Canada being linked with the Canadian Mortality Data Base.; The proportional hazards regression model is commonly used to model survival data as a function of covariates. Typically, these covariates are measured with error and are not directly observable. The Cox proportional hazards model is applied in the Harvard Six Cities Study to estimate the mortality rate ratios for exposure to different air pollutants in individuals, with and without other risk factors as covariates. There are several methods in the literature for adjusting for measurement errors. In this thesis, we consider two recent methods, namely RCAL and SIMEX, and evaluate their effectiveness in correcting measurement errors in the Cox proportional hazard model, using real data from the Harvard Six Cities Study. We use computer simulation to evaluate the accuracy and precision of both RCAL and SIMEX, and to assess the robustness of RCAL to mis-specification of the measurement error distribution.
机译:流行病学研究旨在通过对人群的观察性研究来调查疾病的原因。流行病学研究的总体统计目标是估计的准确性和准确性;也就是说,以尽可能小的误差估算感兴趣参数的值。除随机错误外,流行病学研究还可能涉及系统错误,这会破坏其有效性。记录链接错误和测量错误是流行病学研究中发生的两个常见错误。在本文中,我们研究了连锁错误对各种流行病学风险指标(例如相对风险回归模型参数和标准死亡率)的估计的影响。我们描述了一种在存在链接错误的情况下调整风险指标偏差的方法。为了更详细地探讨记录链接错误对队列死亡率研究的影响,我们基于来自加拿大国家剂量登记局的实际数据与加拿大死亡率数据库进行了模拟研究。比例风险回归模型通常用于将生存数据建模为协变量的函数。通常,这些协变量带有误差,无法直接观察。在哈佛大学六座城市研究中应用了Cox比例风险模型,以估计在有或没有其他风险因素作为协变量的情况下,个人暴露于不同空气污染物的死亡率。文献中有几种方法可以调整测量误差。在本文中,我们考虑了两种最新方法,即RCAL和SIMEX,并使用来自哈佛六城市研究的真实数据评估了它们在纠正Cox比例风险模型中的测量误差方面的有效性。我们使用计算机仿真来评估RCAL和SIMEX的准确性和精度,并评估RCAL对测量误差分布的错误指定的鲁棒性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mallick, Ranjeeta.;

  • 作者单位

    Carleton University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Carleton University (Canada).;
  • 学科 Mathematics.; Biology Biostatistics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 139 p.
  • 总页数 139
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 数学;生物数学方法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号