首页> 外文学位 >Violent disruptions: William Faulkner and Richard Wright's racial imaginations.
【24h】

Violent disruptions: William Faulkner and Richard Wright's racial imaginations.

机译:暴力破坏:威廉·福克纳(William Faulkner)和理查德·怀特(Richard Wright)的种族想象力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Violent Disruptions contends that the works of Richard Wright and William Faulkner are mirror images of each other and that each illustrates American race relations in distinctly powerful and prescient ways. While Faulkner portrays race and American identity through sex and its relationship to the imagination, Wright reveals a violent undercurrent beneath interracial encounters that the shared imagination triggers. Violent Disruptions argues that the spectacle of the interracial body anchors the cultural imaginations of our collective society and, as it embodies and symbolizes American slavery, drives the violent acts of individuals. Interracial productions motivate the narratives of Richard Wright and William Faulkner through a system of displacement of signs. Though these tropes maintain their currency today, they are borne out of cultural imaginings over two hundred years old. Working within the framework of the imaginary, Violent Disruptions places these now historical texts into the twenty-first century's discourse of race and American identity.;In the first part of the dissertation, I show in detail the various narratives at work in William Faulkner's Absalom, Absalom! (1936) in order to portray the imaginations shared by the white characters and disrupted by the interracial body as spectacle. Richard Wright's Native Son (1940) depicts a similar racial imaginary but with more focus on its violent, corporeal effects. By contrast, in the second half of the dissertation, I demonstrate the writers' central and racially- charged characters from their earlier works, Light in August (1932) and Uncle Tom's Cabin (1938; 1940) and look at how the figures of Joe Christmas and Big Boy, respectively, work as literary prototypes for their version in later works.
机译:暴力破坏论断认为,理查德·赖特(Richard Wright)和威廉·福克纳(William Faulkner)的作品互为镜像,并且各自以鲜明有力且有先见之明的方式说明了美国种族关系。福克纳通过性别及其与想象力的关系刻画种族和美国身份,而赖特则揭示了共同的想象力触发的种族间相遇之下的暴力暗流。暴力破坏论认为,异族的景象锚定了我们集体社会的文化想象力,并且在体现和象征美国奴隶制的同时,也推动了个人的暴力行为。异族作品通过符号置换系统激发了理查德·赖特和威廉·福克纳的叙事。尽管这些比喻在今天保持了它们的货币地位,但它们源于超过200年的文化想象。在虚构的框架内,《暴力破坏》将这些现在的历史文本放入了二十一世纪关于种族和美国身份的论述中;在论文的第一部分中,我详细展示了威廉·福克纳的《押沙龙》中各种叙事方式押沙龙! (1936年),以描绘由白色字符共享的想象力,并由异族的身体打乱作为奇观。理查德·赖特(Richard Wright)的《原住民儿子》(Native Son)(1940)描绘了类似的种族想象,但更多地关注其暴力,有形的影响。相比之下,在论文的后半部分,我展示了作家早期作品的中心人物和种族人物,《八月的光》(1932年)和《汤姆叔叔的小屋》(1938年; 1940年),并观察了乔的形象。在后来的作品中,圣诞节和大男孩分别作为其版本的文学原型。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    Harvard University.;

  • 授予单位 Harvard University.;
  • 学科 African American studies.;Black studies.;American literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 179 p.
  • 总页数 179
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号