首页> 外文学位 >Mobilizing the Masses: Social Mobilizations of the Chinese Communist Party in the Eras of Revolution, Regime Building, and Reform.
【24h】

Mobilizing the Masses: Social Mobilizations of the Chinese Communist Party in the Eras of Revolution, Regime Building, and Reform.

机译:动员群众:革命,政权建设和改革时代的中国共产党社会动员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Can mobilization be adopted as a means of governing to address the public issues? This thesis reconceptualizes the term 'mobilization' in the Chinese context based on three basic factors that alter human behaviors, namely, exchange, coercion, and mobilization. It puts forward a novel analytic framework of governing styles to solve the public issues. Under different circumstances, the configuration of the three basic factors adopted to different degrees will generate three ideal governing styles, that is, mobilized governance, bureaucratic management, and market-based settlement. These three ideal governing styles can be differentiated in three dimensions: the rationality of the behavior's motives, the hierarchy of the organization, and the specialized division of labor in solving the public issues.;Using this theoretical framework for analysis, the author compared the changes of the governing styles of the Communist Party of China in three historical periods - revolution era, Maoist era, and reform era, and explored the reasons of the changes. The change of the party's political status altered the characteristics of its organizational structures. This core factor, together with the adjustment of the central tasks and the changes of the guiding thoughts in the party during different historical periods, determined how these means such as mobilization, coercion and exchange were selected and combined. Mass mobilization techniques and working styles obtained in the revolution era remained effective after the party took its ruling position, and it constituted a major legitimate basis of the party's ruling of the country together with the faithful pursuit of effective 'mass line' tactics. However, as the party's coercion capacity and material resources grew over the years and it was getting more hierarchical, mobilization has been weakened and ignored, which led to the gradual failing of the party's daily mass work and social control.
机译:可以采用动员作为治理公共问题的手段吗?本文基于改变人类行为的三个基本因素,即交换,强迫和动员,重新定义了中国语境中的“动员”一词。提出了一种新颖的执政风格分析框架来解决公共问题。在不同的情况下,不同程度采用的三个基本因素的配置将产生三种理想的治理方式,即动员治理,官僚管理和基于市场的结算。这三种理想的执政方式可以从三个方面进行区分:行为动机的合理性,组织的等级制度以及解决公共问题的专门分工。利用这一理论框架进行分析,作者比较了这些变化。回顾了革命时代,毛泽东时代和改革时代三个历史时期中国共产党的执政风格,并探讨了变革的原因。党的政治地位的变化改变了其组织结构的特征。这一核心因素,再加上不同历史时期党的中心任务的调整和党的指导思想的变化,决定了如何选择和结合动员,强制和交换等手段。在党取得执政地位后,革命时代获得的群众动员技巧和工作作风仍然有效,它是党执政的重要合法基础,也是对有效“群众路线”策略的忠实追求。但是,随着多年来党的强制能力和物质资源的增长,而且阶级化程度越来越高,动员被削弱和忽视了,从而导致党的日常群众工作和社会控制逐渐失败。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Weihua.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 204 p.
  • 总页数 204
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号