首页> 外文学位 >Physical properties of two improved experimental root end-filling materials, MTA and Biodentine.
【24h】

Physical properties of two improved experimental root end-filling materials, MTA and Biodentine.

机译:两种改良的实验根部末端填充材料MTA和Biodentine的物理性质。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Introduction: After the expanded use of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) in endodontics, accelerated formulae have been developed to modify and improve the material in regards to its lengthy setting time and compressive strength. Also, manufacturing companies have developed similar materials with superior physical prosperities. The best setting time and compressive strength results were obtained when the composition of the accelerant formulation included CaCl2, fumed silica, and CaHPO4 or Ca 10(PO4)6(OH)2.;Objective: To compare the physical prosperities of two bioactive dental materials, grey MTA (GMTA) and Biodentine and the effect of two developed accelerant formulations in form of aqueous suspensions on their setting time, pH, and compressive strength.;Materials and Methods: Two types of cements were tested: GMTA, and Biodentine. These cements were mixed with either distilled water for GMTA or company liquid (GMTA-W, and Biodentine-CL), accelerant formulation L2 (GMTA-L2, and Biodentine-L2), or accelerant formulation L2-PO4 (GMTA-L2-PO4, and Biodentine-PO4). For pH measurement, 5 samples from each group were tested for 30 minutes from the start of the mix. For the setting time measurement 5 samples from each group were tested using a Gilmore needle apparatus. The compressive strength was tested on 10 samples from each group after 24 hours from the start of the mix. Comparisons between the experimental groups was performed using One-way ANOVA at a 5% level of significance and the non-parametric tests were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test.;Results: The two accelerant formulations did not affect setting pH for both tested materials, GMTA and Biodentine. Also there were no significant difference between GMTA-W and Biodentine-CL pH value. The final setting time of GMTA mixed with formulation L2 or L2-PO4 was significantly shorter than that mixed with distilled water (p < 0.00). In addition, Biodentine-CL showed significantly shorter final setting time than GMTA-W (p < 0.00). The compressive strength values of GMTA mixed with formulation L2 or L2-PO4 were significantly greater than that mixed with water (p < 0.00). Biodentine showed superior compressive strength values compared to all GMTA groups (p <0.00).;Conclusion: Biodentine showed greater compressive strength values and shorter setting time compare to GMTA. The addition of formulation L2 or L2-PO4 to GMTA significantly reduced the setting time and increased the compressive strength. The addition of formulation L2 or L2-PO4 to Biodentine did not change the material physical prosperities tested.
机译:简介:在牙髓病学中广泛使用三氧化二矿骨料(MTA)之后,已经开发了加速配方,以改进和改善材料的凝固时间和抗压强度。此外,制造公司已经开发出具有卓越物理性能的类似材料。当促进剂配方中的成分包括CaCl2,气相二氧化硅和CaHPO4或Ca 10(PO4)6(OH)2时,可获得最佳的凝固时间和抗压强度结果;目的:比较两种生物活性牙科材料的物理性能,灰色MTA(GMTA)和Biodentine以及两种开发的水悬浮液形式的促进剂配方对它们的凝固时间,pH和抗压强度的影响。;材料和方法:测试了两种类型的水泥:GMTA和Biodentine。这些水泥与用于GMTA的蒸馏水或公司液体(GMTA-W和Biodentine-CL),促进剂配方L2(GMTA-L2和Biodentine-L2)或促进剂配方L2-PO4(GMTA-L2-PO4)混合,以及Biodentine-PO4)。为了测量pH,从混合开始就对每组的5个样品进行了30分钟的测试。对于凝固时间的测量,使用Gilmore针头装置测试每组的5个样品。从混合开始24小时后,对每组的10个样品进行抗压强度测试。实验组之间的比较使用单因素方差分析以5%的显着性水平进行,非参数测试使用Kruskal-Wallis测试进行。结果:两种促进剂配方均不影响两种测试材料的设定pH ,GMTA和Biodentine。 GMTA-W和Biodentine-CL pH值之间也没有显着差异。与配方L2或L2-PO4混合的GMTA的最终凝固时间明显短于与蒸馏水混合的最终凝固时间(p <0.00)。此外,Biodentine-CL的最终凝固时间明显短于GMTA-W(p <0.00)。与配方L2或L2-PO4混合的GMTA的抗压强度值明显大于与水混合的抗压强度值(p <0.00)。与所有GMTA组相比,Biodentine的抗压强度值更高(p <0.00)。结论:与GMTA相比,Biodentine的抗压强度值更高,凝固时间更短。将配方L2或L2-PO4添加到GMTA中可显着减少凝固时间并提高抗压强度。向Biodentine中添加配方L2或L2-PO4不会改变所测试的材料物理性能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Allahem, Ziyad.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Dentistry.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 61 p.
  • 总页数 61
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号