首页> 外文学位 >Unraveling [3+2] Cycloaddition Reactions Through the Molecular Electron Density Theory
【24h】

Unraveling [3+2] Cycloaddition Reactions Through the Molecular Electron Density Theory

机译:通过分子电子密度理论解开[3 + 2]环加成反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

After the first classification of [3+2] cycloaddition (32CA) reactions into zw-typeee and pr-type reactions, established in 2014, the structure and reactivity of the most important three-atom-components (TACs) used in 32CA reactions has been completely characterised within the recently proposed Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT). Among the huge amount of work developed along the present Ph.D thesis, eight representative publications have been selected and discussed herein, which allowed characterising two new reactivity types as well as consolidating the original zw-typee e reactivity. Thus, depending on the four different electronic structures of TACs, i.e. pseudodiradical, pseudoradical, carbenoid and zwitterionic, 32CA reactions have been classified into pdr-, pmr-, cb- and zw-typeee reactions. While pdr-type 32CA reactions are the fastest, zw-typeee reactions are the slowest. The different electronic structures at the ground state of the reagents account for this reactivity trend and reveal that the reactivity of carbenoid TACs is different. In addition, no TAC can be considered a 1,2-zwitterionic structure as proposed for "1,3-dipoles". The polar character of the reaction, measured by the global electron density transfer value computed at the transition state structure (TS), affects the four reactivity types in such a manner that the stronger the nucleophilic/electrophilic interactions taking place at the TS, the faster the reaction, and may even change the molecular mechanism according to the Parr functions defined within Conceptual DFT. This MEDT rationalisation of 32CA reactions unravels classical Huisgen's and Firestone's mechanistic proposals established in the 60's. Regardless of the reactivity type and polar character of the reaction, topological analysis of the electron localisation function along one-step 32CA reactions suggests that the bonding changes are not "concerted", but sequential, thus ruling out the classification of these reactions as "pericyclic". In the present thesis, the classical theory of 32CA reactions, established in the 60's of the past century and still prevailing today, is revisited and reinterpreted based on MEDT. A solid new reactivity model for 32CA reactions is established, emphasising that the way that organic chemists conceive organic chemistry demands a contemporary revision aimed towards the analysis of electron density.
机译:在2014年首次将[3 + 2]环加成(32CA)反应分为zw型和pr型反应后,用于32CA反应的最重要的三原子组分(TAC)的结构和反应性在最近提出的分子电子密度理论(MEDT)中已被完全表征。在沿本博士学位论文开展的大量工作中,本文已选择并讨论了八种代表性出版物,这些出版物可表征两种新的反应性类型并巩固原始的zw型e反应性。因此,根据TAC的四种不同电子结构,即伪双基,伪基,类胡萝卜素和两性离子,将32CA反应分为pdr-,pmr-,cb-和zw-typeee反应。虽然pdr型32CA反应最快,但zw型ee反应最慢。试剂在基态下的不同电子结构解释了这种反应趋势,并表明类胡萝卜素TAC的反应性是不同的。另外,没有TAC可以被认为是针对“ 1,3-偶极子”提出的1,2-两性离子结构。反应的极性特征(通过在过渡态结构(TS)处计算的总体电子密度转移值来衡量)以四种方式影响四种反应性,使得TS处发生的亲核/亲电相互作用越强,则反应越快甚至可以根据Conceptual DFT中定义的Parr功能改变分子机理。 MEDT对32CA反应的合理化揭示了60年代建立的经典Huisgen和Firestone的机制建议。无论反应的反应性类型和极性如何,沿一步32CA反应对电子定位功能进行拓扑分析均表明,键合变化不是“令人信服”的,而是顺序的,因此排除了将这些反应归类为“周环的”的可能性。 ”。在本文中,基于MEDT对32CA反应的经典理论进行了重新解释,该理论建立于上个世纪60年代,并在今天仍然盛行。建立了用于32CA反应的可靠的新反应性模型,强调有机化学家构想有机化学的方式需要针对电子密度分析的当代修订。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gutiérrez, Mar Ríos.;

  • 作者单位

    Universitat de Valencia (Spain).;

  • 授予单位 Universitat de Valencia (Spain).;
  • 学科 Organic chemistry.
  • 学位 Dr.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 292 p.
  • 总页数 292
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号