首页> 外文学位 >Enhancing the Nutritive Value of Corn DDGS for Pigs
【24h】

Enhancing the Nutritive Value of Corn DDGS for Pigs

机译:提高玉米DDGS对猪的营养价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Corn dried distillers' grains with solubles (DDGS) can be a good alternative feedstuff to the traditional corn soybean meal diets since it has high fat and protein content. However, it has a high fiber content, which is not well digested by pigs and can reduce nutrient utilization by encapsulation. The nutritive value of fibrous feedstuffs like DDGS can be improved by supplementation with fiber-degrading enzymes. However, fiber-degrading enzymes have not been effective in improving digestibility of DDGS. The overall goal of this thesis research to was to unravel why pigs poorly digest DDGS and to develop strategies that can increase the digestibility of DDGS in pigs.;Objective 1: to determine the effects of supplemental cocktail of fiber-degrading enzymes (multi-enzyme) on porcine in vitro porcine digestion and fermentation characteristics of corn DDGS and wet distillers' grains (Wet DG). With the goal of determining whether or not the drying of Wet DG into DDGS results in reduced digestibility of DDGS by pigs, and in reduced effect of fiber-degrading enzymes on digestibility of DDGS by pigs. Samples of DDGS and wet DG without or with the supplemental multi-enzyme in 2 x 2 factorial arrangement were hydrolyzed in 2 steps using pepsin and pancreatin. Undigested residues were incubated in a buffer solution with minerals and fresh pig feces as inoculum for determination of volatile fatty acid production and kinetics of gas production. The DDGS and Wet DG did not differ in porcine in vitro digestibility and fermentability. In addition, multi-enzyme did not affect porcine in vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of DDGS or Wet DG. Thus, it appears that the drying of Wet DG into DDGS does not affect the digestibility of DDGS by pigs, and that effect of fiber-degrading enzymes on the digestibility of DDGS by pigs is not influenced by drying of Wet DG into DDGS.;Objective 2: To determine the effects of pretreatment and predigestion technologies on in vitro digestion and fermentation characteristics of whole stillage (WS; slurry material that remains after distillation of fermented corn mash, which is subsequently centrifuged to obtain Wet DG that is dried into DDGS); thus, establishing if the poor digestibility of corn DDGS' fiber can improve the digestibility of the DDGS in pigs. This is because pretreatment and predigestion technologies can increase susceptibility of (the otherwise highly indigestible) fiber to digestion or fermentation. The WS was either untreated or pretreated with heat (at 160 °C and 70 psi for 20 min) alone or in combination with citric acid (10 g/L; CA), sulfuric acid (90 mM; H 2SO4) or ammonia (1%; NH3). Untreated WS and pretreated WS were un-predigested or predigested with multi-enzyme (for 24 h) in 5 x 2 factorial arrangement to give 10 treatment combinations. Pre-digested samples together with untreated and pretreated samples were freeze-dried and subjected to porcine in vitro digestion and fermentation as described in Objective 1. Pre-treatment of WS with heat, CA, H2SO4 or NH 3 increased (P < 0.01) in vitro digestibility of DM (IVDDM) by a mean of 13.2%. Also, multi-enzyme predigestion of untreated or pretreated WS increased (P < 0.01) IVDDM by a mean of 13.9%. Pretreatment of WS with heat, CA, or NH2 did not affect total gas production. However, pretreatment of WS with H2SO 4 decreased (P < 0.01) total gas production. Pretreatment of WS with heat, CA, H2SO4 or NH2 decreased (P < 0.01) total VFA production. The results showed that the poor digestibility of DDGS fiber by pigs could be due to recalcitrance of DDGS fiber to enzymatic hydrolysis or fermentation, and that pretreatment and predigestions technologies can be used to improve nutritive value of WS and hence DDGS. Heat and CA pretreatment technologies can be attractive methods of improving the digestibility of DDGS because heat pretreatment is relatively cheaper than alkali or acid pretreatment, and CA is less corrosive than H 2SO4 or NH2.;Objective 3: to determine the effects of pretreating WS heat or CA on nutrient digestibility of the resulting DDGS for growing pigs. The WS was untreated or pretreated with heat (160 °C at 70 psi for 20 min) alone (heat) or with the heat plus CA (12 g/L; heat+CA). Untreated and pretreated WS were paddle-dried before their inclusion in diets. Five diets were fed; they included cornstarch-based containing DDGS, untreated WS, heat-pretreated WS, or CA-pretreated WS as the sole source of protein; and N-free diet. The DDGS diet was included for comparison. The 5 diets were fed to 10 ileal-cannulated barrows (57 +/- 1.53 kg BW) in a replicated 5 x 5 Latin square to give 10 replicates/diet. Untreated WS had greater (P < 0.001) apparent ileal digestibility of GE than DDGS. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.).
机译:玉米干酒糟含可溶物(DDGS)可以替代传统的玉米豆粕日粮,因为它具有较高的脂肪和蛋白质含量。但是,它的纤维含量高,猪无法很好地消化,并且通过封装可以减少养分的利用。 DDGS之类的纤维性饲料的营养价值可以通过添加降解纤维的酶来提高。但是,纤维降解酶在改善DDGS的消化率方面没有有效。本论文研究的总体目标是揭示猪为何消化不良的DDGS,并制定能提高DDGS消化率的策略。目的1:确定补充纤维降解酶混合物(多酶)的效果)猪的体外DDGS和湿酒糟(Wet DG)的猪消化和发酵特性。目的是确定将湿DG干燥成DDGS是否会降低猪对DDGS的消化率,并降低纤维降解酶对猪对DDGS消化率的影响。使用胃蛋白酶和胰酶分两步水解不加或含2 x 2分解素补充多酶的DDGS和湿DG样品。将未消化的残留物与矿物质和新鲜猪粪一起作为缓冲液在缓冲溶液中孵育,以测定挥发性脂肪酸的产生和气体产生的动力学。 DDGS和Wet DG在猪的体外消化率和发酵能力方面没有差异。另外,多酶不影响猪DDGS或Wet DG的体外消化和发酵特性。因此,似乎将湿DG干燥成DDGS不会影响猪对DDGS的消化率,而纤维降解酶对猪DDGS消化率的影响不会受到将湿DG干燥成DDGS的影响。 2:确定预处理和消化技术对全釜馏物(WS;发酵的玉米蒸馏后残留的浆状物质,然后进行离心分离,得到湿的DG,干燥成DDGS)的体外消化和发酵特性的影响;因此,确定玉米DDGS'纤维的消化率低是否可以改善猪中DDGS的消化率。这是因为预处理和消化前技术会增加(否则难以消化的)纤维对消化或发酵的敏感性。 WS单独或与柠檬酸(10 g / L; CA),硫酸(90 mM; H 2SO4)或氨水(1)一起未经处理或经过加热处理(在160°C和70 psi下持续20分钟)进行预处理%; NH3)。未经处理的WS和经过预处理的WS未经预消化或以5 x 2因子布置的多酶预消化(24小时),以提供10种治疗组合。如目标1所述,将预先消化的样品与未处理和预处理的样品一起冷冻干燥,并进行猪体外消化和发酵。 DM的体外消化率(IVDDM)平均为13.2%。同样,未经处理或经过预处理的WS的多酶预消化平均可增加(P <0.01)IVDDM 13.9%。用热,CA或NH2预处理WS不会影响总产气量。但是,用H2SO 4预处理WS降低了总产气量(P <0.01)。用热,CA,H2SO4或NH2预处理WS减少了VFA总产量(P <0.01)。结果表明,猪对DDGS纤维的消化率差可能是由于DDGS纤维对酶水解或发酵的顽固性所致,因此预处理和消化前技术可用于提高WS的营养价值,从而提高DDGS的营养价值。热和CA预处理技术可能是提高DDGS消化率的有吸引力的方法,因为热预处理比碱或酸预处理便宜,而且CA的腐蚀性不如H 2SO4或NH2 .;目标3:确定预处理WS热的效果或CA对生长中猪的DDGS养分消化率的影响。单独或加热(未加热)或加热加CA(12 g / L;加热+ CA)对WS进行未处理或预处理。将未处理和预处理的WS桨叶干燥,然后将其纳入饮食。喂养了五种饮食;它们包括基于玉米淀粉的DDGS,未经处理的WS,经热预处理的WS或经CA预处理的WS作为唯一的蛋白质来源。和无氮饮食。包括DDGS饮食以进行比较。将5种饮食饲喂10个回肠插管的公猪(57 +/- 1.53 kg体重),重复5 x 5拉丁方,每饮食10次。未经处理的WS与DDGS相比,GE的表观回肠消化率更高(P <0.001)。 (摘要由ProQuest缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zangaro, Casey.;

  • 作者单位

    South Dakota State University.;

  • 授予单位 South Dakota State University.;
  • 学科 Animal sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2018
  • 页码 129 p.
  • 总页数 129
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号