首页> 外文学位 >Neural Signatures of Trust in Reciprocity.
【24h】

Neural Signatures of Trust in Reciprocity.

机译:互惠信任的神经签名。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Trust facilitates conditions for safe sharing of valued resources---a social setting vital to success in a wide range of socio-technological networks. With an increasing reliance of economic initiatives on trust-assured interactions, the need to inquire into the mental processes of trust has emerged. This led to a proliferation of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies focusing on domain-specific measures. However, inherent metric deficits of fMRI have resulted in discrete outcomes highlighting further need for constructing a comprehensive neurocognitive model of trust. Here, a domain-general methodology aims at overcoming the negative tendencies in prior fMRI studies by applying a series of coordinate-based "Activation Likelihood Estimation" (ALE) meta-analyses of the fMRI data and a data-driven Multivariate Granger Causality (MVGC) connectivity analysis of hyperscan-fMRI data---an approach not undertaken in trust studies prior to this dissertation. To determine the effects on behavior of cross-study variability in brain activation during a trust-inducing investment game (IG) task, the meta-analysis aims at revealing the extent of neurocognitive differentiation during trust, learning to trust and reciprocity. One-shot IG, implicating unconditional trust, is compared to multi-round IG implicating the conditional trust. In the MVGC study, the neurocognitive differences in the effective connectivity of interpersonal ("brain-to-brain") trust are discerned. Meta-analysis revealed a strong differential response between unconditional trust (ambiguity, insula) and conditional trust (reward, ventral striatum). Learning to trust engaged a goal-guided (rostrolateral PFC) transition between decision-making (dorsal striatum, action-valuation) and feedback processing (ventral striatum, reward reinforcement). Reciprocating trust was linked to insula-mediated norm-compliance tendency to avoid breaking trust. For the effective connectivity analysis, a steady increase in trust and reciprocity engaged a mentalizing network as evidenced in the observed dorsal PFC connectivity with the parietal cortex. Within-trustor, dorsomedial (dmPFC) bidirectional connectivity with posterior cingulate cortex was key to guiding trust-valued choices (hypothalamus). Within-trustee, the key motive of norm-compliance---trustworthiness (lateral orbitofrontal cortex) was mediated by dorsomedial and dorsolateral PFC in Stage 1 and by precuneus in Stage 2. For the brain-to-brain exchange, the trustor's dmPFC was most active, but the trustee's dmPFC was virtually absent indicating dissociable patterns of other-regarding preferences for the trustor and trustee. Collectively, this dissertation lends evidence consistent with the putative socio-cognitive, economic-utility and reinforcement-learning models of trust and opens new perspectives by applying an effective domain-general data-driven dynamic approach.
机译:信任为安全共享有价值的资源创造了条件-这是在广泛的社会技术网络中取得成功至关重要的社会环境。随着经济计划越来越多地依赖于信任保证的互动,出现了探究信任的心理过程的需求。这导致功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究的泛滥,重点是针对特定领域的措施。然而,功能磁共振成像固有的指标缺陷导致离散的结果,突显了进一步构建信任的综合神经认知模型的需求。在这里,领域通用方法旨在通过对fMRI数据进行一系列基于坐标的“激活似然估计”(ALE)元分析和数据驱动的多元Granger因果关系(MVGC)来克服以前的fMRI研究中的负面趋势。 )hyperscan-fMRI数据的连通性分析-在此之前的信任研究中未采用的方法。为了确定在诱导信任的投资游戏(IG)任务过程中交叉研究变异对大脑激活行为的影响,荟萃分析旨在揭示信任,学习信任和互惠过程中神经认知分化的程度。将涉及无条件信任的单次IG与涉及条件信任的多轮IG进行比较。在MVGC研究中,发现了人际(“脑对脑”)信任的有效连接中的神经认知差异。荟萃分析显示无条件信任(歧义,孤立)和条件信任(奖励,腹侧纹状体)之间存在强烈的差异反应。学会信任参与了决策(背侧纹状体,行动评估)和反馈处理(腹侧纹状体,奖励强化)之间的目标指导(后方PFC)过渡。往复式信任与绝缘体介导的规范合规趋势相关联,以避免破坏信任。为了进行有效的连通性分析,信任度和互惠度的不断提高促使人们加入了心理化网络,这在观察到的与顶叶皮质的背侧PFC连通性中得到了证明。受托人内部,背扣带状皮质的背体(dmPFC)双向连接是引导受信任值选择(下丘脑)的关键。在受托人内部,规范遵从性---值得信赖(外侧额叶皮层)的主要动机是由第一阶段的背体和背外侧PFC以及第二阶段的足前神经介导的。对于大脑到大脑的交换,受托人的dmPFC是最活跃,但实际上没有受托人的dmPFC,这表明该受托人和受托人在其他方面的偏好存在可分离的模式。总体而言,本论文提供了与推定的社会认知,经济效用和强化学习信任模型一致的证据,并通过应用有效的领域通用数据驱动的动态方法开辟了新的视角。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chernyak, Sergey V.;

  • 作者单位

    George Mason University.;

  • 授予单位 George Mason University.;
  • 学科 Neurosciences.;Psychobiology.;Ethics.;Economics.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 136 p.
  • 总页数 136
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号