首页> 外文学位 >Literary space in a cartographic frame: Miguel de Cervantes, Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, Jose Donoso, and Witold Gombrowicz.
【24h】

Literary space in a cartographic frame: Miguel de Cervantes, Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, Jose Donoso, and Witold Gombrowicz.

机译:制图框架中的文学空间:Miguel de Cervantes,Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz,Jose Donoso和Witold Gombrowicz。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is based on the premise that it is possible to understand some aspects of the experience of literary space through the careful theoretical appropriation of texts that have been written by cartographers and geographers. In its four chapters I explore how cartographic discourse is relevant to Miguel de Cervantes' performance of a territorialized stability in Don Quixote (1605, 1615), Sor Juana's critique of 'perfect' totalizing vision in her Primero sueno (1692), Jose Donoso's exploration of the nature of the limit in El obsceno pajaro de la noche (1970), and Witold Gombrowicz's attempt to fashion a literary world from the impossibly idiosyncratic path narrated in Cosmos (1965).Each chapter utilizes a different set of cartographic materials. The first chapter emphasizes the cartographic and chorographic work of seventeenth-century cartographers such as Anton van den Wyngaerde and Pedro de Esquivel as well as the general principles of modern cartography as expressed by Ptolemy's Geography. The second chapter relies on the work of feminist geographers and scientists such as Gillian Rose and Donna Haraway while also drawing from the tradition of sixteenth-century anatomical illustration. The third chapter utilizes the work of Benoit Mandelbrot and his critics in order to consider the unstable nature of the anthropocentric limit in cartography. The final chapter depends on Torsten Hagerstrand's work on time geography as well as other contemporary attempts to transform individual paths into coherent maps.In each of these chapters, a different fictional 'body' sustains the literary space in question. Where traditional cartography tends to build on the usually unarticulated sensory experiences of its readers by presenting encoded spatial information from a different perspective, in the case of fiction the 'body' that interacts with the 'space' described is not our own. Even though one might want to read fiction as though it were an everyday map, we inevitably find that there is no arrow indicating that 'you are here.' I argue that it is precisely because of this distance between the body of the reader and the `bodies' of the text that these works are able to create such complex experiences of discursive spatiality.
机译:本文是基于这样一个前提,即通过制图师和地理学家对文本的认真理论运用,有可能理解文学空间体验的某些方面。在其四章中,我探讨了制图语言如何与唐吉x德(1605,1615)中米格尔·德·塞万提斯在领土上的稳定的表现,何塞·胡安纳(Suor Juana)在其总理苏诺(1692)中对“完美”的总体视野的批判,何塞·多诺索的探索如何相关。关于《无尽之门》(El obsceno pajaro de la Noche,1970)的限制的本质,以及Witold Gombrowicz试图从《宇宙》(Cosmos,1965)所描述的不可能的特质路径塑造文学世界的尝试。每一章都使用了不同的制图材料。第一章着重介绍了十七世纪的制图师(例如安东·范·登·温加德(Anton van den Wyngaerde)和佩德罗·德·埃斯基维尔(Pedro de Esquivel))的制图和制图工作,以及托勒密《地理学》所表达的现代制图的一般原理。第二章以女权主义地理学家和科学家(例如吉莉安·罗斯和唐娜·哈拉维)的工作为依据,同时借鉴了16世纪解剖学插图的传统。第三章利用了Benoit Mandelbrot及其批评者的工作,以考虑制图中以人为中心的极限的不稳定性质。最后一章取决于托尔斯滕·哈格斯特朗(Torsten Hagerstrand)在时间地理学方面的工作,以及当代尝试将各个路径转变成连贯的地图的尝试。传统制图倾向于从不同角度呈现编码的空间信息,从而以其读者通常未表达的感觉体验为基础,而在小说中,与所描述的“空间”相互作用的“身体”并不是我们自己的。即使人们可能想把小说当作日常地图来阅读,我们也不可避免地发现没有箭头指示“你在这里”。我认为正是由于读者的身体与文本的“主体”之间的距离,这些作品才能够创造出如此复杂的话语空间体验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ubelaker Andrade, Max.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Literature Modern.Literature Romance.Literature Slavic and East European.Literature Latin American.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 283 p.
  • 总页数 283
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号