首页> 外文学位 >Financial transmission rights: Valuation and auction structure.
【24h】

Financial transmission rights: Valuation and auction structure.

机译:财务传输权:评估和拍卖结构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The acceptance of the nodal pricing system as a mechanism to organize wholesale power markets has exposed both generators and consumers to unprecedented volatile prices. Most of the volatility follows from the method for valuing congestion on the network. Generators and wholesale consumers pay or collect a charge depending on whether their actions cause or relieve congested bottlenecks on the grid. The charges vary according to the location of the injection (source-node) or withdrawal (sink-node) relative to the overall grid topography. Following Hogan (1992), a hedging contract called Financial Transmission Right (FTR) Obligation was introduced in most wholesale power markets. A FTR Obligation, designated in Megawatts, is defined by a source node and sink node. The holder of the contract is entitled (obligated) to a stream of cash flows that exactly offsets the volatile congestion charges. They are initially sold in an auction.;This thesis advances the understanding of the market for FTR Obligations. Two specific areas are addressed. Firstly, the format of the auction for initial sale of FTR Obligations is examined for possible inefficiencies. One such inefficiency -- that the multi-round format creates an opportunity for acquiring a zero-payoff portfolio for net negative cost -- is described. Secondly, this dissertation develops a method for consistently comparing the value of different source-sink node FTR Obligations.;1. Auction Structure and Implications for Bidding Strategy. Congestion charges across the network are jointly determined. Among a subset of FTR Obligations, the relationship assumes a simple form. The thesis demonstrates that the dependency together with a particular auction format creates a profitable opportunity. Examination of the annual auction conducted by PJM Interconnection reveals that investors benefit from this opportunity through systematic bidding beyond first round.;2. Valuing FTR Obligations. FTR Obligations are essentially non-hedgeable contracts. Owing to the joint determination of congestion charges, the values of FTR Obligations exhibit a structure. This thesis capitalizes on the dependence structure to relatively value FTR Obligations. By suitably depicting the common sources of uncertainty, the dissertation derives the parameters of individual contracts' payoff distributions thus facilitating a consistent comparison among different source-sink FTR Obligations.
机译:节点定价系统作为组织电力批发市场的一种机制,已被接受,这使发电商和消费者都面临前所未有的价格波动。大多数波动来自评估网络拥塞的方法。发电者和批发消费者根据其行为是造成还是缓解电网拥堵的瓶颈来支付或收取费用。电荷根据注入(源节点)或撤出(汇节点)相对于整个网格拓扑的位置而变化。在Hogan(1992)之后,在大多数批发电力市场中引入了一种称为金融传递权(FTR)义务的对冲合同。 FTR义务(以兆瓦为单位)由源节点和宿节点定义。合同的持有人有权(有义务)获得一定量的现金流量,以完全抵消波动性的交通拥堵费。它们最初是通过拍卖出售的。本论文提高了FTR义务市场的理解。解决了两个具体领域。首先,检查FTR义务的初始销售的拍卖形式是否存在效率低下的问题。描述了一种这样的低效率-多轮融资格式为获取净负成本的零回报投资组合创造了机会。其次,本文提出了一种比较不同的源汇节点FTR义务值的方法。1。拍卖结构及其对出价策略的影响。共同确定整个网络的拥塞费用。在FTR义务的子集中,该关系采用简单形式。论文证明了这种依赖性和特定的拍卖形式一起创造了有利可图的机会。通过对PJM互连公司进行的年度拍卖的调查发现,投资者可以通过第一轮之后的系统性投标从中受益。重视FTR义务。 FTR义务本质上是不可对冲的合同。由于共同确定了拥堵费,FTR义务的值显示出一种结构。本文利用依存结构来相对重视FTR义务。通过适当地描述不确定性的常见来源,本论文推导了单个合同收益分配的参数,从而促进了不同源汇FTR义务之间的一致比较。

著录项

  • 作者

    Canchi, Devendra.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Economics Finance.;Engineering Electronics and Electrical.;Engineering Industrial.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号