首页> 外文学位 >Calling campus police: A test of procedural justice and unresponsive bystander models.
【24h】

Calling campus police: A test of procedural justice and unresponsive bystander models.

机译:致电校园警察:对程序公正性和反应迟钝的旁观者模型的测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation focuses on the phenomenon of campus crime reporting, specifically students' self-reported likelihood of reporting a petty theft, aggravated assault, indecent exposure, or gun possession incident to the college public safety department, municipal police, and a member of the library staff. This project tests two different social psychology models that predict indirect bystander intervention, or a third party relying on another third party to assist someone in need. The survey vignette design involves experimental manipulation of several situational variables in line with the 'unresponsive bystander' model (Latane & Darley, 1970) and subsequent scholarship. The procedural justice model (Tyler & Blader, 2003) focuses on how the process rather than the outcome of law enforcement-citizen encounters influences future cooperation. I extend this theory and empirical scholarship to the institution of campus policing. Undergraduate respondents (n = 554) indicated that the most powerful influences on their hypothetical reporting behaviors were situational factors, specifically the severity of the witnessed crime scenario, with anonymity and bystander group size non-significant. In addition, the procedural justice model receives strong support from this empirical evaluation. General procedural justice ratings serve as a significant predictor of evaluations of campus police legitimacy. In turn, legitimacy ratings are a significant predictor of reporting willingness, controlling for distributive justice. Extension of the procedural justice model to the campus police context indicates that in addition to procedural justice ratings, undergraduates view the crime-fighting effectiveness of the campus police as a key influence on their evaluation of campus police legitimacy. As several prior procedural justice studies controlled for instrumental variables such as police effectiveness or performance, this represents an area for future exploration and theorization.
机译:本文着重于校园犯罪举报现象,特别是学生向大学公共安全部门,市警察和图书馆成员举报小偷小摸,严重殴打,不雅暴露或持枪事件的自我报告可能性。员工。该项目测试了两种预测间接旁观者干预的社会心理学模型,或者预测了第三方是否依赖另一个第三方来帮助有需要的人。小插图的设计涉及根据“无反应的旁观者”模型(Latane&Darl​​ey,1970)和随后的研究,对几种情境变量进行实验操作。程序正义模型(Tyler&Blader,2003)关注的是执法过程-而不是执法公民的遭遇-如何影响未来的合作。我将这种理论和实证研究扩展到校园警务机构。大学生(n = 554)表示,对其假设举报行为的最大影响是情境因素,特别是目击犯罪场景的严重性,匿名性和旁观者人数并不重要。此外,程序正义模型得到了这一经验评估的有力支持。一般程序正义等级是评估校园警察合法性的重要指标。反过来,合法性评级是报告意愿的重要预测指标,控制着分配正义。将程序正义模型扩展到校园警察环境表明,除了程序正义等级之外,大学生还将校园警察的反犯罪效率视为对其评估校园警察合法性的关键影响。由于先前的一些程序正义研究都对工具变量(例如警察的效能或绩效)进行了控制,因此这是未来探索和理论化的领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aiello, Michael F.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Criminology.;Social psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2016
  • 页码 198 p.
  • 总页数 198
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号