首页> 外文学位 >Laboratory testing of railroad flatcars for use as highway bridges on low-volume roads to determine ultimate strength and redundancy.
【24h】

Laboratory testing of railroad flatcars for use as highway bridges on low-volume roads to determine ultimate strength and redundancy.

机译:在低流量道路上用作公路桥梁的铁路平板车的实验室测试,以确定极限强度和冗余度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Railroad flatcars (RRFCs) are a convenient option to replace existing deteriorating bridge structures on low-volume roads. They are typically used as the bridge superstructure by placing two or more flatcars side-by-side to achieve the desired bridge width. Utilizing RRFCs as a bridge allows for rapid construction and greater cost savings compared to traditional practices. These benefits make them an attractive solution for rural communities in Indiana, as well as other states. Uncertainty remains about the response under higher loads than could be easily achieved in the field and the level of redundancy of railroad flatcar bridges. Using RRFCs as bridges becomes less economical for counties if they do not display adequate load-path redundancy and are labeled "fracture critical." If labeled as such, life-cycle costs would rise due to the requirement of an arms-length inspection for each 24 month inspection period. Laboratory testing of a RRFC bridge with two flatcars placed side-by-side allowed for experimental testing under higher loads, as well as increased amounts of instrumentation to better understand the behavior of the RRFCs. As a result of the experimental data, load rating guidelines were developed for RRFC bridges constructed with a fully composite concrete deck. The research also focused on the level of system redundancy in a RRFC bridge after failure of one of the two main box girders. Procedures were developed to estimate whether the remaining longitudinal members provide sufficient available capacity to carry traffic loads.
机译:铁路平板车(RRFC)是替换低流量道路上现有的恶化桥梁结构的便捷选择。它们通常通过并排放置两个或更多平板车来用作桥梁上部结构,以实现所需的桥梁宽度。与传统做法相比,利用RRFC作为桥梁可以快速构建并节省更多成本。这些好处使它们成为印第安纳州和其他州农村社区的有吸引力的解决方案。在更高负载下的响应仍存在不确定性,这在铁路平板车桥梁的现场和冗余水平上很难实现。如果RRFC没有显示足够的负载路径冗余并且被标记为“严重断裂”,则将RRFC用作桥梁对于县来说将变得不那么经济。如果这样标明,由于需要在每个24个月的检查期内进行独立的检查,因此生命周期成本将增加。具有两个并排放置的平板车的RRFC桥的实验室测试允许在更高的负载下进行实验测试,并增加了仪器数量,以更好地了解RRFC的行为。根据实验数据,为使用完全复合混凝土面板建造的RRFC桥梁制定了额定载荷准则。研究还集中在两个主箱梁之一发生故障后的RRFC桥中的系统冗余级别。制定了程序来估计剩余的纵向构件是否提供足够的可用容量来承载交通负荷。

著录项

  • 作者

    Washeleski, Teresa Lynn.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 M.S.C.E.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 254 p.
  • 总页数 254
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号