首页> 外文学位 >Witnessing, modernism, failure: Constructions of cowardice in First World War novels by Sinclair, West, and Woolf.
【24h】

Witnessing, modernism, failure: Constructions of cowardice in First World War novels by Sinclair, West, and Woolf.

机译:见证,现代主义,失败:辛克莱,韦斯特和伍尔夫在第一次世界大战小说中的怯ward建构。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This thesis explores how May Sinclair's The Tree of Heaven (1917), Rebecca West's The Return of the Soldier (1918), and Virginia Woolf's Mrs. Dalloway (1925) depict female witnesses to male First World War behaviours, particularly "funk" and "shell shock," that were constructed as cowardice. An individual's traumatic experience of fear perceived to be cowardice also includes the shame of cultural condemnation; moreover, because it turns on an accusation of failed masculinity, cowardice also destabilizes the male subject upon whom the social order is founded. Within these novels, then, cowardice functions as a locus for early-twentieth-century British culture's broader anxieties about shifting social structures, especially gender norms and related understandings of subjectivity. Witnessing has the potential to heal trauma by rebuilding subjectivity, but in each of these modernist novels, witnessing fails. Sinclair's propagandist form of witnessing supports normative gender roles and glorifies war; West, by contrast, criticizes the social structures that privilege normative behaviour over individual fulfillment; and Woolf shows witnessing and healing to be impossible within a postwar culture characterized by hierarchal subject relations. Read alongside psychoanalysis, trauma theory, and a model of transformative witnessing, Sinclair's, West's, and Woolf's constructions of cowardice can be seen to demonstrate a particularly modernist witnessing dynamic. All three novels employ modernist techniques to represent male trauma and female response, and all three portray failed witnessing as capitulation to British First World War cultural norms. Such failed witnessing, I argue, is part of the novels' modernist portrayal of cultural change: the pattern of female witnesses to male cowardice maps complex interconnections between the First World War and modernist literary innovation.
机译:本文探讨了梅·辛克莱尔(May Sinclair)的《天堂之树》(1917),丽贝卡·韦斯特(Rebecca West)的《士兵归来》(1918)和弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫(Virginia Woolf)的夫人达洛维(Dalloway)(1925)如何描述第一次世界大战男性行为的女性证人,特别是“朋克”和“轰动一时的胆怯”。一个人被视为怯trauma的恐惧的创伤经历还包括文化谴责的耻辱。而且,因为怯because导致了男性气概的失败,怯ward也破坏了建立社会秩序的男性主体的稳定。因此,在这些小说中,怯ward是二十世纪初英国文化对转变社会结构,尤其是性别规范和有关主观性的认识更为广泛的焦虑的根源。目击者有可能通过重建主观性来治愈创伤,但是在每本现代派小说中,目击都是失败的。辛克莱的宣传形式是支持规范的性别角色,并美化了战争。相比之下,西方则批评将规范行为置于个人成就之上的社会结构。伍尔夫(Woolf)表明,在以等级主题关系为特征的战后文化中,目睹和治愈是不可能的。与心理分析,创伤理论和变革性的见证模型一起阅读时,辛克莱,韦斯特和伍尔夫的怯construction构造可以被看作是一种特别现代主义的见证动态。所有这三本小说都采用现代主义的手法来表现男性的创伤和女性的反应,而这三部小说均未能见证英国第一次世界大战文化规范的屈服。我认为,这种失败的见证是小说对文化变革的现代主义描写的一部分:女性见证者对男性怯ward的模式描绘了第一次世界大战与现代主义文学创新之间的复杂联系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Joyes, Kaley.;

  • 作者单位

    McMaster University (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 McMaster University (Canada).;
  • 学科 British Irish literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 277 p.
  • 总页数 277
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号