首页> 外文学位 >Slavery in the classical utopia: A comparative study.
【24h】

Slavery in the classical utopia: A comparative study.

机译:古典乌托邦的奴隶制:一项比较研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The literary genre of utopia arose out of two main source elements in classical antiquity. These can be differentiated by their divergent approaches to slavery and enslavement, and reflect, respectively, the attitudes of slaves, or of masters towards concepts of ideal societies. Therefore, the terms are derived: servile perspective utopia, dominant perspective utopia, and "hybrid utopia", a combination of the two. The servile perspective is characterized by an idealization of release from compulsion, a transformation of the natural order, and the undermining of socio-political order. Examples of it include the mythology of the Age of Kronos and the god Dionysos, the fragments and complete works of Old Comedy, the literature connected with Cynic philosophy, the New Comic works of Plautus, and the Augustan Elegiac poets. The dominant perspective represents the ideal society as internalizing the value of compulsion and mastery, accepting nature as it is in reality, and establishing and maintaining socio-political order. Examples of it include Plato's Republic, Laws , and his myth of Atlantis, Aristotle's Politics, Xenophon's Cyropaedia, and literature on the "real-life" utopianists the Pythagoreans and the Spartans. Hybrid utopias are ideal societies that internalize the value of compulsion as well as that of release, and promise a transformation of nature as a reward for the establishment and maintenance of socio-political order. These include: Travelogues such as the accounts of Herodotus' Ethiopians, Iambulus' Islands of the Sun, where alteration of Nature takes place in the context of political virtue. Apuleius' Metamorphosis involves an inverse transformation of Naure, where servile values are eventually subsumed into dominant. Real-life hybrid utopias include the communities of Essenes, who absorb the Cynic and comic ideal of the primacy of Nature, but follow dominant values, and the accounts of ancient slave rebellions, which utilize both servile and dominant utopian techniques.
机译:乌托邦的文学体裁源于古代的两个主要来源要素。这些可以通过对奴隶制和奴役的不同方式来区分,分别反映奴隶或主人对理想社会概念的态度。因此,衍生出以下术语:奴性视角的乌托邦,优势视角的乌托邦和“混合性乌托邦”,两者结合。奴役观点的特征在于理想化的强迫释放,自然秩序的转变以及社会政治秩序的破坏。它的例子包括克罗诺斯时代的神话和狄俄尼索斯神,旧喜剧的片段和完整作品,与犬儒哲学有关的文学作品,普劳图斯的新漫画作品以及奥古斯都的挽歌诗人。占主导地位的观点代表了理想的社会,它内化了强迫和精通的价值,接受现实中的自然,并建立和维护社会政治秩序。它的例子包括柏拉图的共和国,法律和他的亚特兰蒂斯神话,亚里斯多德的政治学,色诺芬的Cyropaedia,以及有关“现实中”的乌托邦主义者毕达哥拉斯和斯巴达人的文献。混合性乌托邦是理想化的社会,它内化了强迫和释放的价值,并承诺改变自然,以奖励建立和维护社会政治秩序。其中包括:游记,例如希罗多德的埃塞俄比亚人,伊姆布卢斯的太阳群岛等,在政治美德的背景下自然发生了变化。 Apuleius的蜕变涉及Naure的逆变换,其中奴隶值最终被归为主导。现实生活中的混合乌托邦包括埃森斯(Essenes)社区,他们吸收了对自然至高无上的犬儒主义和喜剧性理想,但遵循主流价值观,以及利用奴隶制和主流乌托邦技术的古代奴隶叛乱的描述。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fairey, Emily.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Literature Classical.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 306 p.
  • 总页数 306
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 世界文学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号