首页> 外文学位 >Practices and Factors Influencing Sharps Use and Safety in a Suburban Fire Department and Among Emergency Medical Services Personnel.
【24h】

Practices and Factors Influencing Sharps Use and Safety in a Suburban Fire Department and Among Emergency Medical Services Personnel.

机译:影响郊区消防部门和紧急医疗服务人员的尖锐人员使用和安全的实践和因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Needlestick injuries (NSIs) are a recognized risk for occupationally-related transmission of bloodborne pathogens (BBP). The occurrence of NSIs and BBP exposures among firefighters (FFs) and emergency medical services (EMS) personnel has been documented.;The purposes of this study were: 1) to define the problem of NSI among FFs and EMS personnel in a suburban fire department (FD) and identify practices and factors that influence sharps use and safety; 2) design and implement and intervention to promote safer sharps device usage; and 3) to measure the effectiveness of the intervention among FFs and EMS personnel.;A multi-phase, mixed methods approach was used that included a diagnosis phase that utilized a mixed methods exploratory design, an intervention period, and a quantitative evaluation phase that used a before and after evaluation design. In the diagnosis phase, data regarding sharps device practices were obtained through a count of discarded sharps devices. During the baseline sharps count, 2743 sharps devices were counted and classified according to pre-established categories of safer or risky behaviors for NSI. Input from eight focus groups of firefighters allowed for identification of multiple themes which guided the development of an intervention.;The intervention included distribution of a hands-on training kit and booklet, expansion of an existing required BBP training, and posters to increase awareness regarding NSI prevention.;In the evaluation phase, a total of 2178 sharps devices were counted and classified in a post-intervention sharps count. Altered safety devices on IV stylets were the highest count of unsafe behaviors (n=50). Recapped traditional needles were the second highest count of unsafe behaviors (n=27), but experienced an 18.7% drop in frequency when compared to baseline. When comparing riskier behaviors to the pre-intervention baseline sharps count, statistically significant decreases in risky behaviors were observed in all sharps devices combined (χ2=25.71, p=0.000), IV stylets (χ2=16.87, p=0.000), and traditional needles (χ2=5.07, p=0.024).;A post-intervention survey, consisting of 15 Likert scale questions, was returned by 165 out of 383 active field personnel (41.3%). Results indicated high frequencies of strongly agree and somewhat agree responses regarding risk perception; the importance of using safer needle devices; the impact of the intervention on safer needle practices and sharps safety awareness.;Critical predisposing, reinforcing, enabling, and environmental factors which influenced sharps device practices were identified. This study identified factors and practices which influenced unsafe sharps device behaviors. Due to the statistically significant decreases in risky behavior in the post-intervention sharps count and the positive responses in the post-intervention survey, it can be concluded that the intervention did positively impact sharps device behavior and reduced the risk of NSI. The implications of the study are numerous and include a need to explore these practices and factors at other fire departments and EMS agencies, address gaps in regulations; promote research targeting FFs and EMS personnel in regard to NSI, and promote a nationwide effort to prevent NSI among emergency responders. (Abstract shortened by UMI.).
机译:针刺伤(NSI)是与职业有关的血源性病原体(BBP)传播的公认风险。已经记录了消防员(FFs)和紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员中NSI和BBP暴露的发生。这项研究的目的是:1)确定郊区消防局的FFs和EMS人员中NSI的问题(FD)并确定影响锋利人士使用和安全的做法和因素; 2)设计和实施以及进行干预,以促进更安全的利器设备使用; 3)评估FF和EMS人员之间干预的有效性。;采用了多阶段,混合方法的方法,其中包括利用混合方法探索性设计的诊断阶段,干预期和定量评估阶段,使用了前后评估设计。在诊断阶段,通过计算丢弃的锋利设备的数量获得有关锋利设备操作的数据。在基线锐器计数期间,根据预先确定的NSI安全或危险行为类别对2743枚锐器设备进行了计数和分类。来自八个消防员焦点小组的投入可以确定指导干预措施制定的多个主题;干预措施包括分发动手培训工具包和小册子,扩大现有的必要BBP培训以及张贴海报以提高人们对干预措施的认识NSI预防。;在评估阶段,总共对2178支锋利器械进行了计数,并在干预后的锐器计数中进行了分类。 IV探针上的安全装置变更是不安全行为的最高发生率(n = 50)。翻新的传统针头是不安全行为的第二高数字(n = 27),但与基线相比,频率下降了18.7%。当将危险行为与干预前基线锐利计数进行比较时,在所有组合的锐利器械(χ2= 25.71,p = 0.000),IV探针(χ2= 16.87,p = 0.000)和传统方法中,观察到危险行为的统计学显着降低针(χ2= 5.07,p = 0.024)。干预后的调查由383名活跃的现场人员中的165人返回,包括15个李克特量表问题(占41.3%)。结果表明,人们对风险感知的反应高度一致,有些共识。使用更安全的针头装置的重要性;干预措施对更安全的针头操作和锋利者安全意识的影响。确定了影响锋利器操作习惯的关键性诱因,强化,启用和环境因素。这项研究确定了影响不安全的锐器设备行为的因素和做法。由于干预后利器计数中危险行为的统计显着减少以及干预后调查中的积极反应,可以得出结论,干预确实对利器设备的行为产生了积极影响,并降低了NSI的风险。该研究的意义是广泛的,包括需要在其他消防部门和EMS机构中探索这些实践和因素,解决法规中的空白;促进针对FF和EMS人员的NSI研究,并在全国范围内努力防止紧急情况响应者中的NSI。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)。

著录项

  • 作者

    McGuire-Wolfe, Christine.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Florida.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.;Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 260 p.
  • 总页数 260
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:03

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号