首页> 外文学位 >The influence of demand model selection on household welfare estimates: An application to South African food expenditures.
【24h】

The influence of demand model selection on household welfare estimates: An application to South African food expenditures.

机译:需求模型选择对家庭福利估计的影响:在南非食品支出中的应用。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study analyzes food expenditure patterns in South Africa, taking into account differences in demand behavior across rural and urban households, as well as across income groups. The study makes three main contributions from this study. First, it develops a Lagrange Multiplier (LM) test that can be used to determine whether the demand model should be specified with a quadratic or a linear expenditure term. The advantage of this test over the Wald test, which is based on the significance of the quadratic expenditure term in the demand model, is that it can be conducted without having to explicitly estimate the quadratic (in expenditure) demand model, which tends to be highly nonlinear. Second, the study examines the effects on household welfare of an indirect food tax reform, and evaluates the magnitude of the biases in the welfare estimates due to demand model is misspecification. The tax reform evaluated is the zero-rating of value-added tax (VAT) on meat products. Lastly, this study examines the differences in the consumption patterns between rural and urban households, and across households in different income groups. The study makes use of panel data on household food consumption in South Africa, collected as part of the KwaZulu-Natal Income Dynamics Study.; Results from both the LM and the Wald tests support the inclusion of the quadratic expenditure term. The implication of this finding is that popular functional forms such as the almost ideal demand system (AIDS), which have Engel curves that are linear in expenditure, would not give an accurate picture of demand behavior of the households considered in this study. Given these findings, this study estimates the quadratic almost ideal demand system (QUAIDS), which a generalization of AIDS that allows for a quadratic relationship between budget shares and expenditure. The QUAIDS model is used to estimate demand functions for seven food groups---grains, meat and fish, fruits and vegetables, dairy, oils and fats, sugar, and other foods. The endogeneity of expenditure in the demand model is explicitly tested and, where necessary, corrected for using the control function approach. The model is also adjusted to account for a large fraction of observed zero expenditures using a two-step procedure appropriate for equation system estimation.; Five of the seven food groups were found to be expenditure elastic, the exceptions being meat and fish and other foods. Demand behavior differs significantly between rural and urban households, as well as across income groups, implying that an accurate analysis of expenditure patterns in South Africa requires a disaggregated analysis that takes into account this heterogeneity in demand behavior. All households gain from the removal of VAT on meat, with welfare gains being larger for high-income households. On average, the AIDS expenditure elasticity estimates tend to be larger than the estimates based on QUAIDS. The AIDS model was also found to systematically overstate the welfare gains of the tax reform considered on this study, particularly for households with large expenditure levels.
机译:这项研究分析了南非的粮食支出模式,同时考虑了城乡家庭以及不同收入群体的需求行为差异。该研究对这项研究做出了三点主要贡献。首先,它开发了一个拉格朗日乘数(LM)检验,该检验可用于确定是用二次支出项还是线性支出项来指定需求模型。该测试相对于Wald检验的优势是基于需求模型中二次支出项的重要性,它的优点是无需明确估计二次(支出)需求模型即可进行检验。高度非线性。其次,该研究考察了间接食品税改革对家庭福利的影响,并评估了由于需求模型错误指定而导致的福利估计中的偏差幅度。评估的税制改革是肉类产品的增值税零税率。最后,本研究考察了城乡家庭之间以及不同收入群体家庭之间的消费模式差异。该研究利用了南非家庭食物消费的面板数据,该数据是夸祖鲁-纳塔尔国民收入动态研究的一部分。 LM和Wald检验的结果都支持包含二次支出项。这一发现的含义是,流行的功能形式,如几乎理想的需求系统(AIDS),其恩格尔曲线的支出呈线性关系,因此无法准确反映本研究中所考虑的家庭的需求行为。根据这些发现,本研究估计了几乎理想的二次需求系统(QUAIDS),它是对AIDS的概括,可以使预算份额与支出之间存在二次关系。 QUAIDS模型用于估计七个食物组的需求函数-谷物,肉和鱼,水果和蔬菜,乳制品,油脂,糖和其他食物。需求模型中支出的内生性得到明确测试,并在必要时使用控制功能方法进行校正。使用适合方程系统估计的两步程序,还可以对模型进行调整,以解决观察到的零支出的很大一部分。发现七个食物类别中有五个具有弹性支出,但肉,鱼和其他食物除外。城乡家庭以及收入群体之间的需求行为差异很大,这意味着要对南非的支出模式进行准确的分析,就需要进行分类分析,以考虑到需求行为的这种异质性。所有家庭都将从取消肉类增值税中获得收益,高收入家庭的福利收益更大。平均而言,艾滋病支出的弹性估计数往往大于基于QUAIDS的估计数。还发现艾滋病模型系统地夸大了这项研究中考虑的税收改革的福利收益,特别是对于支出水平较高的家庭。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bopape, Lesiba Elias.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Economics Agricultural.; Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 164 p.
  • 总页数 164
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;农业经济;经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:54

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号