首页> 外文学位 >Weak party institutionalization and the dynamics of political dialogue.
【24h】

Weak party institutionalization and the dynamics of political dialogue.

机译:政党制度化薄弱以及政治对话的动力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Does weak party institutionalization shape political dialogue? Research on dialogue argues that parties' ability to gain advantage on issues drives the decision to talk to their opponents. Parties, it is argued, have niches of advantaged issues created through prior experiences, performance, posturing and positioning through platforms. In institutionalized party systems, party labels provide informative cues to voters and provide electoral benefits to party members. In weakly institutionalized party systems, however, party labels provide limited information about the party preferences, and carry little electoral value. In weak party systems, consequently, parties fail to disclose consistent programmatic messages that may be readily interpreted by voters, failing to gain electoral benefits on advantaged issues.;Failure by parties to imbue value to labels and gain advantage over issues dramatically changes how we understand political dialogue in weakly institutionalized party systems. We expect, as I will show, political dialogue to be more prevalent, as politicians engage each other in futile attempts to control issues and communicate to voters their policy preferences. As parties become institutionalized, they claim issues and reinterpret past performance. Issue control eventually generates incentives for politicians to talk past each other, effectively reducing dialogue.;This dissertation seeks to explain how weakly institutionalized parties shape political dialogue. I will provide a theoretical rational and empirical support showing that in weakly institutionalized party systems, political dialogue differs from dialogue observed in highly institutionalized settings. To this end, this dissertation uses novel techniques of content analyses to study over 14,000 op-ed articles by 230 Venezuelan politicians from 1996 to 2007. Statistical research is complemented with interviews conducted in Venezuela, providing new insight into political dialogue in the aftermath of the collapse of the Punto Fijo regime in the 1990's.;My research will show that in weakly institutionalized party systems, dialogue is prevalent and issue advantage is unlikely.
机译:弱势的政党制度化会影响政治对话吗?对话研究认为,各方在问题上获得优势的能力决定了与对手对话的决定。各方认为,通过平台的先前经验,绩效,姿态和定位,会产生一些利好问题。在制度化的政党系统中,政党标签为选民提供了信息提示,并为党员提供了选举收益。但是,在制度化程度较弱的政党制度中,政党标签提供的政党偏好信息有限,几乎没有选举价值。因此,在弱势的政党系统中,政党无法披露一致的程序化信息,而选民可能会轻易地理解这些信息,从而无法在有利的问题上获得选举收益。政党未能赋予标签以价值和在问题上获得优势的失败极大地改变了我们的理解制度化的政党体系薄弱的政治对话。正如我将要表明的那样,我们期望政治对话会更加普遍,因为政治家彼此参与徒劳地试图控制问题并向选民传达他们的政策偏好。随着政党制度化,他们要求解决问题并重新解释过去的表现。问题控制最终激发了政界人士相互交谈的动力,有效地减少了对话。本论文旨在解释制度化的政党如何弱化政治对话。我将提供理论上的理论和经验支持,表明在制度化程度较弱的政党体系中,政治对话不同于在制度化程度很高的环境中观察到的对话。为此,本论文使用新颖的内容分析技术研究了1996年至2007年委内瑞拉的230名政客的14,000篇文章。统计研究与委内瑞拉的访谈相辅相成,为委内瑞拉战后的政治对话提供了新见解。我的研究将显示,在制度化程度较弱的政党体系中,对话盛行,对话的可能性不大。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sagarzazu, Inaki.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Houston.;

  • 授予单位 University of Houston.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 273 p.
  • 总页数 273
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号