首页> 外文学位 >Modeling and testing of fast response, fiber-optic temperature sensors.
【24h】

Modeling and testing of fast response, fiber-optic temperature sensors.

机译:快速响应的光纤温度传感器的建模和测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this work was to design, analyze and test a fast response fiber-optic temperature probe and sensor. The sensor is intended for measuring rapid temperature changes such as produced by a blast wave formed by a detonation. This work was performed in coordination with Luna Innovations Incorporated, and the design is based on extensions of an existing fiber-optic temperature sensor developed by Luna. The sensor consists of a glass fiber with an optical wafer attached to the tip. A basic description of the principles behind the fiber-optic temperature sensor and an accompanying demodulation system is provided.; For experimental validation tests, shock tubes were used to simulate the blast wave experienced at a distance of 3.0 m from the detonation of 22.7 kg of TNT. The flow conditions were predicted using idealized shock tube theory. The temperature sensors were tested in three configurations, flush at the end of the shock tube, extended on a probe 2.54 cm into the flow and extended on a probe 12.7 cm into the flow. The total temperature was expected to change from 300 K to 1130 K for the flush wall experiments and from 300 K to 960 K for the probe experiments. During the initial 0.1 milliseconds of the data the temperature only changed 8 K when the sensors were flush in the end of the shock tube. The sensor temperature changed 36 K during the same time when mounted on a probe in the flow. Schlieren pictures were taken of the flow in the shock tube to further understand the shock tube environment. Contrary to ideal shock tube theory, it was discovered that the flow did not remain stagnant in the end of the shock tube after the shock reflects from the end of the shock tube. Instead, the effects of turbulence were recorded with the fiber-optic sensors, and this turbulence was also captured in the schlieren photographs. A fast-response thermocouple was used to collect data for comparison with the fiber-optic sensor, and the fiber-optic sensor was proven to have a faster response time compared to the thermocouple. When the sensors were extended 12.7 cm into the flow, the fiber-optic sensors recorded a temperature change of 143 K compared to 38 K recorded by the thermocouple during the 0.5 millisecond test. This corresponds to 22% of the change of total temperature in the air recorded by the fiber-optic sensor and only 6% recorded by the thermocouple. Put another way, the fiber-optic sensor experience a rate of temperature change equal to 2.9x105 K/s and the thermocouple changed at a rate of 0.79x105 K/s. The data recorded from the fiber-optic sensor also contained much less noise than the thermocouple data.; An unsteady finite element thermal model was created using ANSYS to predict the temperature response of the sensor. Test cases with known analytical solutions were used to verify the ANSYS modeling procedures. The shock tube flow environment was also modeled with Fluent, a commercially available CFD code. Fluent was used to determine the heat transfer between the shock tube flow and the sensor. The convection film coefficient for the flow was predicted by Fluent to be 27,150 W/m2K for the front of the wafer and 13,385 W/m2K for the side. The Fluent results were used with the ANSYS model to predict the response of the fiber-optic sensor when exposed to the shock tube flow. The results from the Fluent/ANSYS model were compared to the fiber-optic measurements taken in the shock tube. It was seen that the heat flux to the sensor was slightly over-predicted by the model, and the heat losses from the wafer were also over-predicted. Since the prediction fell within the uncertainty of the measurement, it was found to be in good agreement with the measured values. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)
机译:这项工作的目的是设计,分析和测试快速响应的光纤温度探头和传感器。该传感器用于测量快速的温度变化,例如爆炸引起的爆炸波所产生的温度变化。这项工作是与Luna Innovations Incorporated协调完成的,其设计基于Luna开发的现有光纤温度传感器的扩展。传感器由玻璃纤维组成,玻璃纤维附着在尖端上。提供了对光纤温度传感器和相关解调系统背后原理的基本描述。为了进行实验验证测试,使用了冲击管来模拟从22.7千克TNT爆炸到3.0 m处的爆炸波。使用理想化的激波管理论预测了流动条件。对温度传感器进行了三种配置的测试,在冲击管的末端齐平,在探头中伸入流体2.54厘米,在探头中伸入流体12.7厘米。对于齐平壁实验,总温度预计从300 K变为1130 K,对于探针实验,总温度预计从300 K变为960K。在最初的0.1毫秒数据中,当传感器在减震管的末端冲洗时,温度仅变化8K。在将传感器安装在流中的探头上的同时,传感器温度变化了36K。 Schlieren拍摄了冲击管中的流动照片,以进一步了解冲击管的环境。与理想的激波管理论相反,发现在激波从激波管的末端反射之后,流量不会在激波管的末端保持停滞。而是用光纤传感器记录了湍流的影响,并且在schlieren照片中也捕获了这种湍流。使用快速响应的热电偶收集数据,以便与光纤传感器进行比较,并且事实证明,与热电偶相比,光纤传感器具有更快的响应时间。当传感器延伸到流量中12.7厘米时,光纤传感器记录的温度变化为143 K,而在0.5毫秒的测试中,热电偶记录的温度变化为38K。这相当于光纤传感器记录的空气中总温度变化的22%,而热电偶记录的只有6%。换句话说,光纤传感器的温度变化率为2.9x105 K / s,而热电偶的变化率为0.79x105 K / s。从光纤传感器记录的数据也比热电偶数据包含的噪声少得多。使用ANSYS创建了一个不稳定的有限元热模型来预测传感器的温度响应。具有已知分析解决方案的测试案例用于验证ANSYS建模过程。冲击管流动环境也用Fluent(可商购的CFD代码)建模。 Fluent用于确定激波管流量与传感器之间的热传递。 Fluent预测该流的对流膜系数对于晶片的前部为27,150 W / m2K,对于晶片的前部为13,385 W / m2K。 Fluent结果与ANSYS模型一起使用,以预测暴露于激波管流中的光纤传感器的响应。 Fluent / ANSYS模型的结果与在冲击管中进行的光纤测量进行了比较。可以看出,该模型对传感器的热通量略有过度预测,并且晶片的热损失也被过度预测。由于预测值落在测量的不确定性之内,因此可以发现它与测量值非常吻合。 (摘要由UMI缩短。)

著录项

  • 作者

    Tonks, Michael James.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Aerospace.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 132 p.
  • 总页数 132
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 航空、航天技术的研究与探索;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号