首页> 外文学位 >Archives of democracy: Technologies of witness in literatures on Indian democracy since 1975.
【24h】

Archives of democracy: Technologies of witness in literatures on Indian democracy since 1975.

机译:民主档案:1975年以来有关印度民主的证人技术。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation analyzes the transformation of the nationalist call for freedom in India into public deliberations on postcolonial democracy. By focusing on the impact of the political crisis emerging around the Indian state, in the wake of its decreasing legitimacy since the 1970s, the state's significance in shaping postcolonial culture is made evident. While the postcolonial condition in India has frequently been studied through imaginative renderings of nationalisms, in examining cultural responses to the state's centrality, I am compelled to cast my gaze on a different variety of forms in the annals of postcolonial letters.; This study heuristically constitutes an "archive of democracy" to represent the profusion of technologies and genres of witness: altogether, the lyrics of underground poetry, the drama of inquiry commissions and litigation, the narratives of novels, and the quotidian prose of journalism and official files, all formulate a basis for examining the querying of postcolonial freedom. The Emergency of 1975 was a significant event for the career of Indian democracy. Following extensive discussions in political theory, my study of postcoloniality follows this event through the aftermath of globalization to trace the changes in democratic discourse.; By applying the insights of political and social theories to this context of increasing democratization and decreasing state legitimacy, I map state and citizen usages of varying technologies of witness. The relay of postcolonial social imaginaries against the backdrop of Constitutional provisions for liberty, justice, equality and fraternity serves as a guiding framework. I argue that by reading the Indian Constitution as a fiction of the state, the legacies informing democratic practices and discourses are made manifest. These legacies include Gandhian satyagraha, Nehruvian statism, Ambedkarite syncretism and Naxalite ambush, and yield a new understanding of recent postcolonial formations such as the demand for state accountability. By detailing a range of texts (Emergency literature, court rulings in the post-Emergency period, citizen diaries etc.), I illuminate a new basis for resurrecting state legitimacy. These literatures read alongside social imaginaries show how the state shifts its public rationale from development to democracy.
机译:本文分析了印度民族主义对自由的呼吁向后殖民民主的公众讨论的转变。自1970年代以来合法性下降之后,通过关注印度国家周围发生的政治危机的影响,印度在塑造后殖民文化中的重要性就显而易见了。尽管经常通过富有想象力的民族主义手法来研究印度的后殖民状况,但在考察文化对国家中心地位的回应时,我不得不将目光投向后殖民信件书中的各种形式。该研究启发性地构成了“民主档案”,以代表大量的技术和证人:地下诗歌的歌词,调查委员会和诉讼的戏剧,小说的叙事以及新闻和官方的日常散文档案,都为审查后殖民自由的查询奠定了基础。 1975年的紧急状态是印度民主事业的重要事件。在对政治理论进行了广泛的讨论之后,我对后殖民主义的研究在全球化之后追踪了这一事件,以追溯民主话语的变化。通过将政治和社会理论的见解应用于这种日益民主化和减少国家合法性的背景下,我绘制了各种证人技术对国家和公民的使用情况。在宪法关于自由,正义,平等和友爱的条款的背景下,后殖民社会假想的传递是一个指导框架。我认为,通过将印度宪法视为国家的虚构,便可以体现出民主实践和话语的遗产。这些遗产包括Gandhian satyagraha,Nehruvian国家主义,Ambedkarite合体主义和Naxalite伏击,对最近的后殖民形式,例如对国家问责的要求有了新的认识。通过详细介绍一系列文本(紧急事件文献,紧急事件发生后的法院裁定,公民日记等),我阐明了恢复国家合法性的新基础。这些与社会假想一起阅读的文献表明,国家如何将其公共理论从发展转向民主。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dodd, Maya.;

  • 作者单位

    Stanford University.;

  • 授予单位 Stanford University.;
  • 学科 Literature Comparative.; Literature Asian.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.; Journalism.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 262 p.
  • 总页数 262
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 文学理论;世界史;新闻学、新闻事业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号