首页> 外文学位 >French and Italian feminist exchanges in the 1970s: Queer embraces in queer time.
【24h】

French and Italian feminist exchanges in the 1970s: Queer embraces in queer time.

机译:1970年代的法国和意大利女权主义交流:酷儿拥抱酷儿。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation offers a queer feminist investigation of some literary and theoretical works that constituted the body politics of French and Italian feminist and gay movements of the 1970s. Through comparative analyses of Luce Irigaray's Ce sexe qui n 'en est pas un, Dacia Maraini's Donna in guerra, Annie Ernaux's L'evenement, Carla Lonzi's Taci anzi parla and Sputiamo su Hegel, Guy Hocquenghem's Le desir homosexuel, Mario Mieli's Elementi di critica omosessuale, Monique Wittig's Le corps lesbien and Les guerilleres, and Helene Cixous's Le rire de la Meduse, I argue that these works articulate a queer discourse of sexuality and gender that predates 1990s queer theory. My work is situated within the cultural and historical background of 1970s French and Italian feminist movements, and it consists of multiple comparisons---which I call queer embraces---that bring together French and Italian feminists, feminists and gays, 1970s feminism and 1990s queer theory. These comparisons allow for a queer critique of feminism and a feminist critique of gay theory. In chapter one I show that Dacia Maraini's and Annie Ernaux's novels deconstruct the notion of traditional motherhood and destabilize a hetero-normative construction of narrative and discourse through what I call queer abortions. In chapter two I look at Lonzi's construction of the donna clitoridea through the allegory of the clitoris. I maintain that the clitoris signifies both the complexity of female homosociality in radical feminism and the discovery of female sexual autonomy as a form of queer female subjectivity. In chapter three I analyze the feminist theories of desire by Irigaray and Lonzi along with the gay theories of Hocquenghem and Mieli. I argue for a queer feminist resistance to phallic discourse, which inscribes female queerness through the modes of male queerness and of gayness through feminism. In chapter four I propose a queer reading of ecriture feminine as ecriture butch by examining the simultaneous emergence of the categories of woman and lesbian in Cixous's and Wittig's texts. Furthermore, the comparisons within each chapter work through a notion of queer temporality, which disturbs the linear cause-and-effect narrative and redefine the 1970s as queer time.
机译:本文对一些文学和理论作品进行了奇怪的女权主义研究,这些著作构成了1970年代法国和意大利女权主义和同性恋运动的身体政治。通过对Luce Irigaray的《 Ce sexe quin'en est pas un》,Dacia Maraini的《 Donna in guera》,Annie Ernaux的《 L'evenement》,Carla Lonzi的Taci anzi parla和Sputiamo su Hegel,Guy Hocquenghemhem的《欲望的同性恋》,Mario Suelies的评论家Mario Mieliale的比较分析我认为莫妮克·维蒂希(Monique Wittig)的《 Le corps lesbien and Les guerilleres》和海伦妮·希克斯(Helene Cixous)的《里尔·德拉里·梅杜兹(Le rire de la Meduse)》,我认为这些作品在1990年代的酷儿理论之前就表达了对性和性别的奇怪论述。我的作品位于1970年代法国和意大利女权运动的文化和历史背景下,它包含多重比较-我称之为酷儿拥抱-将法国和意大利女权主义者,女权主义者和同性恋者,1970年代女权主义和1990年代的古怪理论。这些比较可以使对女权主义的古怪批评和对同性恋理论的女权主义批评成为可能。在第一章中,我展示了达契亚·马莱尼(Dacia Maraini)和安妮·埃纳克斯(Annie Ernaux)的小说解构了传统母性观念,并通过所谓的酷儿堕胎破坏了叙事和话语的异规范建构。在第二章中,我将通过阴蒂的寓言来探讨朗兹对阴蒂的建构。我坚持认为,阴蒂既象征着激进女权主义中女性同性恋的复杂性,又象征着女性性自主的一种奇怪的女性主观性。在第三章中,我分析了伊里加里和朗兹的女性主义欲望理论,以及霍奎金姆和米埃利的同性恋理论。我主张同性恋者对阴茎话语的反抗,这是通过男性性格和通过女权主义的同性恋模式来刻画女性性格。在第四章中,我通过考察希克索斯和维蒂希的文本中同时出现的女性和女同性恋类别,提出了一种对女性的刻板理解的奇怪读物。此外,每一章中的比较都是通过“酷儿时间性”概念来进行的,该概念扰乱了线性的因果关系叙述,并将1970年代重新定义为酷儿时间。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dalla Torre, Elena.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Michigan.;

  • 授予单位 University of Michigan.;
  • 学科 Literature Romance.;Gender Studies.;GLBT Studies.;Womens Studies.;European Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 237 p.
  • 总页数 237
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号