首页> 外文学位 >Claiming Valhalla: Archaeology, national identity, and the German-Danish borderland, 1830--1950.
【24h】

Claiming Valhalla: Archaeology, national identity, and the German-Danish borderland, 1830--1950.

机译:自称瓦尔哈拉:考古,民族身份和德丹麦边境,1830年至1950年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation traces the emergence of an academic community of archaeologists in the contested German-Danish borderland of Schleswig-Holstein from 1830 to 1950 in order to explore the uses of the distant past for creating modern national identities. The study considers the role of professional scholars in claiming and contesting shared heritages for diverging nationalist ends and explains how scholars handled the paradox of participating in nation-building projects while maintaining their commitments as members of a transnational scholarly community. The study begins in the 1830s with the founding of the Kiel Museum of Antiquities, which was the product of collaboration between German and Danish antiquarians. It then follows the work of antiquarian scholars in the period of the German-Danish Wars from 1848 to 1864, when prehistory became a focal point of claims to territory and led antiquarians to contest the ownership of artifacts such as the Nydam Boat and the Flensburg Collection. In the wake of the wars, the work of scholars such as Johanna Mestorf and Sophus Muller led to a renewal of cross-border collaboration, which resulted in the discovery of the lost Viking trading town of Haithabu and aided the development of a scientific model for the practice of archaeology. The success of research in both countries fostered the production of narratives of prehistory based on scientific methods but tied to national histories. Archaeologists such as Gustaf Kossinna envisioned the borderland as the site of the earliest Germanic peoples and the starting point of Germanic prehistory. The result was a "Nordic paradigm" for prehistoric development with strong racial and imperialist overtones that coexisted with traditional scientific approaches. The dissertation traces the transformation of such thinking in Schleswig-Holstein during the early twentieth century and considers its political implications in the Nazi Era, when the transnational context played a key role in the engagement of borderland scholars with the Third Reich. The study concludes with an appraisal of the fate of nationalist orientations for German and Danish archaeology and the impact of borderland archaeologists on their discipline and their respective national communities.
机译:本论文追溯了1830年至1950年在有争议的德国-丹麦边境石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州一个考古学家学术团体的出现,以探索遥远的过去在创建现代民族身份中的用途。该研究考虑了专业学者在主张和争夺具有不同民族主义目的的共同遗产方面的作用,并解释了学者如何处理参加国家建设项目的悖论,同时又保持其作为跨国学术界成员的承诺。这项研究始于1830年代,即基尔古迹博物馆的建立,这是德国和丹麦古物之间合作的产物。然后,它沿袭了1848年至1864年德国-丹麦战争时期古人类学者的工作,当时史前史成为人们争夺领土的焦点,并导致古人类对诸如Nydam Boat和Flensburg Collection等文物的所有权提出质疑。 。战争爆发后,约翰娜·梅斯托夫(Johanna Mestorf)和索菲斯·穆勒(Sophus Muller)等学者的工作导致了跨境合作的更新,从而发现了失落的维京人交易小镇海塔布(Haithabu),​​并为建立科学模型提供了帮助。考古实践。两国研究的成功促进了基于科学方法但与民族历史联系在一起的史前叙述的产生。古斯塔夫·科辛纳(Gustaf Kossinna)等考古学家认为,这片边境地区是最早的日耳曼人民的所在地,也是日耳曼史前史的起点。其结果是史前发展的“北欧范式”,具有强烈的种族和帝国主义色彩,并与传统科学方法共存。论文追溯了二十世纪初石勒苏益格-荷尔斯泰因州这种思想的转变,并考虑了其在纳粹时代的政治影响,当时跨国背景在边疆学者与第三帝国的交往中发挥了关键作用。该研究以对德国和丹麦考古学的民族主义倾向的命运以及边境考古学家对其学科和各自民族的影响进行了评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hare, J. Laurence.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.; History European.; History Modern.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 322 p.
  • 总页数 322
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 古人类学;欧洲史;现代史(1917年~);国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号