首页> 外文学位 >Achieving government, community and institutional goals through the measurement of performance: Accountability and performance indicators in Ontario colleges and universities.
【24h】

Achieving government, community and institutional goals through the measurement of performance: Accountability and performance indicators in Ontario colleges and universities.

机译:通过绩效衡量实现政府,社区和机构目标:安大略省高校的问责制和绩效指标。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 1998, the Ontario government established performance indicators for its publicly funded colleges and universities to both assess performance and distribute part of the public funds allocated to higher education. This initiative was consistent with the actions of governments throughout the world and has significance for both the systems of higher education and the individual institutions wherever it is in place.;This study examined several issues including government motivation for measuring the performance of postsecondary institutions; a critical analysis of the Ontario accountability framework against both public policy goals for postsecondary education and established standards and criteria for performance measurement systems; perceptions of stakeholders regarding public goals and the efficacy of the current accountability system; and recommendations for changes to the Ontario performance indicator system based on research results.;The study relied on a review of government documents and related literature, and the results of a survey of stakeholders regarding government goals for postsecondary education, the relevance and reliability of the current performance indicators for measuring performance and influencing funding, and identification of other indicators relevant to assess the performance of Ontario colleges and universities.;The study found that the perceptions of stakeholders regarding government goals for postsecondary education were reasonably consistent with those found in public documents. However, the lack of a clear statement of government goals, together with some misalignment of perceived goals and those the current performance indicators appear to be measuring, caused confusion and could also result in inappropriate steering effects on the behaviour of colleges and universities. The study also found that the current Ontario accountability framework was only moderately consistent with the standards and criteria for postsecondary performance indicators established in the literature. Other significant findings of the study include differences in perceived goals for colleges and universities but similar indicators to measure performance, the lack of provision for mission-related institutional goals contrary to recommendations in the literature, and that transferability from college to university, a clearly stated goal of the government, is neither measured nor rewarded by performance funding.;Recommendations for changes to the system and suggestions for future research are included.
机译:1998年,安大略省政府为其公立大学建立了绩效指标,以评估绩效并分配分配给高等教育的部分公共资金。该倡议与世界各国政府的行动相一致,并且对高等教育系统和任何地方的单个机构都具有重要意义。这项研究研究了几个问题,包括政府衡量高等教育机构绩效的动机;对安大略省问责制框架进行了严格的分析,既针对中学后教育的公共政策目标,也针对绩效衡量系统的既定标准和标准;利益相关者对公共目标和当前问责制有效性的看法;该研究的依据是对政府文件和相关文献的回顾,以及对利益相关者关于政府高等教育目标的调查结果,相关性和可靠性。当前用于衡量绩效和影响资金的绩效指标,并确定与评估安大略省大学和大学绩效相关的其他指标。该研究发现,利益相关者对政府中等教育目标的看法与公共文件中的看法基本一致。但是,缺乏对政府目标的明确陈述,加上人们对目标的不正确理解以及当前绩效指标似乎正在衡量中,导致了混乱,并且还可能导致对大学行为的不当指导作用。该研究还发现,当前的安大略省问责制框架仅与文献中确立的中学后绩效指标的标准和标准相称。该研究的其他重要发现包括:大学和大学的预期目标存在差异,但衡量绩效的指标相似;缺乏与文献相关的与任务相关的机构目标的规定;以及大学与大学之间的可转移性政府的目标既不能通过绩效资金来衡量也不能得到回报。包括对制度变化的建议和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 481 p.
  • 总页数 481
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号