首页> 外文学位 >The effect of sneezing and clothing on the airborne spread of Staphylococcus aureus.
【24h】

The effect of sneezing and clothing on the airborne spread of Staphylococcus aureus.

机译:打喷嚏和穿衣服对金黄色葡萄球菌空中传播的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background. Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is among the most important pathogens in today's hospital setting.;Objective. The aims were to investigate the effects of histamine-induced sneezing and the efficacy of commonly used barrier precautions on airborne dispersal of SA in volunteers with and without experimentally induced common colds.;Design. Prospective non-randomized experiment.;Setting. Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.;Participants. 21 nasal SA carriers.;Interventions/measurements. Airborne dispersal of SA was studied in volunteers in chamber sessions using volumetric air samplers. After pre-exposure measurements (2 or 4 days), volunteers were inoculated with a rhinovirus and followed for a total of 16 days. Ten volunteers underwent daily sneezing and non-sneezing sessions, and 11 participated in the following clothing conditions: street clothes (SC), surgical scrubs (SS), surgical scrubs plus gown (SG), and the latter plus mask (SM) (N95). Daily quantitative nasal and skin cultures for bacteria and nasal cultures for rhinovirus were obtained, cold symptoms were assessed, and volunteer activities recorded during sessions.;Results. All participants developed cold symptoms. Sneezing caused a 4.71-fold increase in airborne dispersal of SA (p0.001) releasing an additional 2.83 colony forming units/m3/min SA per sneeze. The cold did not change sneezing frequency or airborne dispersal. Respiratory allergies increased the spread of SA by 3.75-fold (p0.001). Incidence risk ratios (IRR) indicated a 75% reduction of SA from SC to SS, 80% reduction from SC to SG, and 82% reduction from SC to SM (p0.001). Adding a mask was not effective in reducing SA dispersal (8% reduction, p>0.05). Male volunteers shed twice as much SA than females (IRR: 2.04, p=0.013). The cold did not alter the efficacy of barrier precautions.;Conclusion. Nasal carriers of SA expel a significant amount of SA into the air by sneezing. A cold does not affect bacterial dispersal patterns, but respiratory allergies multiply the effect of sneezing SA. Dressing in scrubs and gowns reduces the airborne dispersal of SA independent of a cold. A mask does not further reduce airborne SA. This emphasizes the need for a better understanding of the potential risk by sneezing and in the utilization of masks for prevention of SA transmission.
机译:背景。金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)是当今医院环境中最重要的病原体之一。目的是研究组胺引起的打喷嚏的影响以及常用屏障预防措施对有或没有实验诱发的普通感冒的志愿者中SA空气传播的影响。设计。前瞻性非随机实验;设置。维克森林大学,北卡罗来纳州温斯顿-塞勒姆;参与者。 21支鼻SA携带者。干预/措施。使用容积式空气采样器在室内会议中的志愿者中研究了SA的空气传播。暴露前测量(2或4天)后,将鼻病毒接种给志愿者,然后进行总共16天的随访。每天有10名志愿者进行打喷嚏和不打喷嚏,其中11名参与者符合以下穿着条件:街头服装(SC),外科手术擦洗(SS),外科手术擦洗加长袍(SG)和后者加口罩(SM)(N95 )。获得每日定量的鼻和皮肤细菌培养物和鼻病毒鼻病毒培养物,评估感冒症状,并在会议期间记录志愿者活动。所有参与者出现感冒症状。打喷嚏导致SA在空气中的传播增加4.71倍(p <0.001),每次打喷又释放了2.83个菌落形成单位/ m3 / min SA。感冒并没有改变打喷嚏的频率或空气传播的扩散。呼吸道过敏使SA的扩散增加了3.75倍(p <0.001)。发生风险比(IRR)表明,从SC到SS的SA降低了75%,从SC到SG的SA降低了80%,从SC到SM的SA降低了82%(p <0.001)。添加面膜对减少SA扩散无效(减少8%,p> 0.05)。男性志愿者流失的SA量是女性的两倍(IRR:2.04,p = 0.013)。感冒并没有改变屏障预防措施的功效。 SA的鼻腔载体通过打喷嚏将大量的SA排入空气。感冒不会影响细菌的传播方式,但呼吸道过敏会加重打喷嚏SA的作用。穿着磨砂膏和长袍的敷料可以减少SA在空气中的散播,而不受感冒的影响。口罩不会进一步降低机载SA。这强调需要更好地了解通过打喷嚏和使用口罩预防SA传播的潜在风险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bischoff, Werner Ernst.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;

  • 授予单位 The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Occupational Health and Safety.;Health Sciences Medicine and Surgery.;Health Sciences Public Health.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 367 p.
  • 总页数 367
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号