首页> 外文学位 >Discretion and the administrator: The case of child care reform in Ohio
【24h】

Discretion and the administrator: The case of child care reform in Ohio

机译:自由裁量权和行政管理人:俄亥俄州儿童保育改革案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is an assessment of factors that affect the 88 directors of the Ohio County Department of Job and Family Services (CDJFS) agencies likely use of administrative discretion based on resources available to implement child care policy (i.e., funding, staff, technical support and training, number of providers, years of experience as CDJFS director, and the number of hours per week spent implementing child care policy). Directors' use of administrative discretion is analyzed using a qualitative (interview) and quantitative (survey) approach commonly referred to as triangulation. By combining the results of the qualitative and quantitative phases of the study, the researcher was able to gain relevant information regarding the directors' perceptions of their use of administrative discretion based on the resources they have available to implement child care policy in their county.;Using SPSS, this study employed content and regression analysis to analyze the qualitative and quantitative data collected from the interviews and questionnaires. This assessment includes an overview of the devolution of child care policy implementation from the federal to state government, the relationship between implementation and the exercise of administrative discretion, and current research on child care policy implementation. An examination of the results obtained from the content analysis in this study revealed that the CDJFS directors used administrative discretion to implement child care policy, but their use of administrative discretion was limited by the number of staff they had available to assist with child care policy implementation and the number of certified providers certified in their county. Although the regression analysis did not yield significant results, more than half of the CDJFS directors interviewed, indicated they were likely to use administrative discretion to implement child care policy based on the availability of resources.
机译:本文是对影响俄亥俄州县工作和家庭服务部(CDJFS)机构的88名董事的因素进行评估,这些机构可能根据实施育儿政策的可用资源(例如,资金,员工,技术支持和培训,提供者的数量,担任CDJFS主任的经验以及每周执行儿童保育政策所花费的小时数)。通过定性(访谈)和定量(调查)方法(通常称为三角剖分)来分析董事对行政自由裁量权的使用。通过将研究的定性和定量阶段的结果相结合,研究人员能够根据其在本县实施育儿政策的可用资源,获得有关董事对使用行政自由裁量权的看法的相关信息。使用SPSS,本研究使用内容和回归分析来分析从访谈和问卷调查中收集的定性和定量数据。该评估包括儿童保育政策实施从联邦政府移交给州政府的概述,实施与行政自由裁量权之间的关系,以及有关儿童保育政策实施的最新研究。对本次研究内容分析得出的结果进行的调查显示,CDJFS董事使用行政自由裁量权实施儿童保育政策,但他们对行政自由裁量权的使用受到可协助实施儿童保育政策的人员数量的限制。以及其所在县获得认证的认证提供者的数量。尽管回归分析并没有产生明显的结果,但接受采访的CDJFS董事中有一半以上表示,他们可能会根据资源的可用性,运用行政管理权实施育儿政策。

著录项

  • 作者

    Slone, Wendy Jay.;

  • 作者单位

    Cleveland State University.;

  • 授予单位 Cleveland State University.;
  • 学科 Public administration.;Public policy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 148 p.
  • 总页数 148
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号