首页> 外文学位 >Development and validation of a measure of postmodernity in dress.
【24h】

Development and validation of a measure of postmodernity in dress.

机译:服装后现代性度量的开发和验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The young adult market segment of Generation Y is likely to have developed different consumer behavior patterns from those of previous generations (Bakewell & Mitchell, 2003). What were the major macro-environment changes that shaped Generation Y's consumer behavior to be different to some extent from the generation of many of their parents, the Baby Boomers? Generation Y grew up during the shift that occurred from the late 20th century to the early 21st century. This time period is often referred to as the postmodern era (Henderson & DeLong, 2000) or the late capitalism period (Kaiser, Nagasawa, & Hutton, 1995).; The purpose of this study was to develop theory-based, validated measures of being postmodern in dress. The findings also enhance understanding of Generation Y's postmodern dress consumption behaviors. The main objectives of the study were (1) to generate belief items about dress from postmodern theories and previous literature; (2) to develop a second instrument that measures preferences for visual stimuli of postmodern styles; and (3) to evaluate construct, criterion, and content validities of the two developed instruments. The main hypothesis proposed was that there is a positive relationship between perceptions of visual stimuli of postmodern dress and scores on dimensions of the belief measure.; Dress belief and behavior items were generated from theory for the first measure and assessed for face validity by three researchers. Statements included 58 items related to postmodern ideals and to pre-postmodern ideals. Items were rated on a Likert-type, 7-point scale of agreement. For the second measure, 22 visual stimuli were selected from an initial 80 pictures of dressed bodies by three Textiles and Clothing researchers. Pictures were selected that incorporated components of postmodern style. Each picture was rated on three scales: "the outfit is attractive." "the outfit is cool," and "I would like to wear this." Pretest data was collected from a convenience sample of 25 students to check for usability of the items and to reduce the number of visual stimuli. Twelve of the visual stimuli were chosen from the pretest results for the main data collection questionnaire, based on degree of variability of responses. Only styles that had a wide range of responses on the three scales were selected.; A random sample of 3000 female students at a Midwestern university were invited by e-mail to participate in the main study. Respondents included 431 Gen Y female college students who were mostly juniors and seniors, probably due to the data collection period of summer school. Respondents were offered entry into a raffle for retail coupons as an incentive for participation.; Exploratory factor analysis was employed to test construct validity of the measure of being postmodern in dress. Principal components factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha were used to examine construct validity. Pearson correlations were conducted to test criterion validity. The four factors of the belief/behavior measure were "Preference for Uniqueness," "Brand and Rule Oriented," "Shopping Flexibility," and "Desire for Body Modification." Brand and Rule Oriented items describe modern or non-postmodern dress consumption, and the other factors were related to three dimensions of postmodern characteristics. Reliabilities ranged from .70 to .91.; A Postmodern score was created by summing across strongly weighted items on the three postmodern belief/behavior factors. The Postmodern score was positively correlated with the sum of all ratings of the Visual Stimuli; thus, Hypothesis 1 was supported, as was criterion validity of the measures. Participants who rated the postmodern visual stimuli more favorably were more likely to have higher scores on the postmodern in dress variable. Therefore, the belief/behavior and visual stimulus measures of postmodern dress were simultaneously validated.; Although postmodern theories have been studied and employed in the schol
机译:Y世代的年轻成人细分市场可能已发展出与前几代人不同的消费者行为模式(Bakewell&Mitchell,2003年)。导致Y​​代消费者行为与许多父母(婴儿潮一代)的一代在某种程度上不同的主要宏观环境变化是什么? Y世代在20世纪后期到21世纪初的转变中成长。这段时期通常被称为后现代时代(Henderson&DeLong,2000)或晚期资本主义时期(Kaiser,Nagasawa,&Hutton,1995)。这项研究的目的是开发基于理论的,经过验证的服装后现代测量方法。这些发现还增强了对Y代后现代服饰消费行为的理解。这项研究的主要目的是:(1)从后现代理论和以前的文献中产生关于服饰的信念。 (2)开发第二种工具来衡量对后现代风格视觉刺激的偏好; (3)评估两种已开发工具的结构,标准和内容有效性。提出的主要假设是,后现代服饰的视觉刺激感知与信念量度得分之间存在正相关关系。着装信念和行为项是从理论上首先得出的,并由三位研究人员进行了脸部有效性评估。声明包括与后现代理想和后现代理想有关的58个项目。项目按照李克特式的7分制协议进行评分。对于第二项措施,三位纺织品和服装研究人员从最初的80张穿戴好的身体照片中选择了22种视觉刺激。选择了包含后现代风格成分的图片。每张照片的评分分为三个等级:“衣服很吸引人”。 “衣服很酷”和“我想穿这件衣服”。从25名学生的便利样本中收集了预测试数据,以检查项目的可用性并减少视觉刺激的次数。根据响应的变化程度,从主要数据收集问卷的预测试结果中选择十二种视觉刺激。仅选择在三个等级上具有广泛响应的样式。通过电子邮件邀请了中西部大学的3000名女学生作为随机样本参加这项主要研究。受访者包括431名Y代女大学生,他们大多为大三和大四,可能是由于暑期学校的数据收集期所致。为受访者提供了参加零售抽奖的抽奖活动,以鼓励他们参与。探索性因素分析被用来检验服装后现代测量方法的构造效度。主成分因子分析和Cronbach的阿尔法用于检查构造的有效性。进行Pearson相关性以检验标准的有效性。信念/行为量度的四个因素是“对独特性的偏好”,“以品牌和规则为导向”,“购物灵活性”和“对身体修饰的渴望”。面向品牌和规则的物品描述了现代或非后现代的服饰消费,其他因素与后现代特征的三个维度有关。可靠性范围从.70到.91。后现代得分是通过对三个后现代的信念/行为因素进行加权后得出的总和来创建的。后现代评分与视觉刺激的所有评分之和呈正相关。因此,假说1的支持,以及衡量标准的有效性。对后现代视觉刺激评分更高的参与者更有可能在后现代服饰变量上获得更高的分数。因此,后现代服饰的信念/行为和视觉刺激措施得到了同时验证。尽管已经对后现代理论进行了研究和应用

著录项

  • 作者

    Park, Sunhee.;

  • 作者单位

    Iowa State University.;

  • 授予单位 Iowa State University.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Marketing.; Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 123 p.
  • 总页数 123
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;社会学理论与方法论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号