首页> 外文学位 >Essays in trade and environment: The environmental effects of intraindustry trade.
【24h】

Essays in trade and environment: The environmental effects of intraindustry trade.

机译:贸易与环境论文:产业内贸易对环境的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Environmental concerns are at the center stage of current global debates on issues ranging from climate change to natural resource conservation. Anthropogenic sources of environmental degradation include development activities undertaken to increase economic growth and welfare. In the late twentieth century, industrialization characterized the developmental paths of countries seeking to modernize and to raise per capita incomes. Countries that engage in international trade expand their potential beyond domestic borders to reach a global and richer market. As globalization becomes an important aspect of economic development, countries with accelerated growths in dirty industries are viewed as contributing to the deterioration of environmental problems such as global warming, deforestation and resource depletion. Globalization, it is argued, leads to the expansion of pollution-intensive production which causes harm to the environment.;It is widely recognized that international trade raises economic welfare. The succeeding question is, if production is pollution intensive, does international trade necessarily lead to detrimental effects on the environment? Is there evidence to suggest that trade is beneficial or harmful to the environment?;This dissertation explores the environmental implication of the engagement of trade in differentiated, dirty goods. The first essay entitled Monopolistic Competition, Trade and the Environment, presents three analyses. First, it develops a trade-and-environment framework for an economy that produces differentiated, pollution-intensive (or dirty) goods. The production of dirty goods is shown to lead to three environmental effects, namely, the scale, technique and selection effects. Second, it presents a comparative statics analysis of the effects of a change in environmental policy on the firm's level of abatement, product price, consumption, the scale of production and the number of firms in the economy. Third, it examines the relationship between openness to trade and the environment. The impact of intra-industry trade is shown to be the sum of the scale, technique and selection effects. In the second essay, Intra-industry Trade and the Environment, the general framework developed in the first essay is modified to allow for a constant-elasticity of substitution (CES) utility function. It shows, unambiguously, that free trade does not lead to detrimental environmental effects. A comparative statics analysis shows that an increase in the stringency of environmental policy generates a negative technique effect and neutral scale and selection effects. In the third essay, How Does Infra-industry Trade Affect the Environment?, the integrated theoretical predictions of the pollution models of intra-industry as wells as inter-industry trade are tested using panel-data methods. Statistical evidence suggests the following. First, the emissions of sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds are increasing in the selection, scale, technique and composition effects. Second, the selection effect is an important and relevant variable in the estimation of the full impact of international trade on emissions level. Third, results conform to the realizations of data generated by the framework of intra-industry as well as of inter-industry trade. Fourth and finally, greater openness to trade or increased trade liberalization, leads to a decrease in emissions level.
机译:在当前有关气候变化到自然资源保护等问题的全球辩论中,对环境的关注正处于中心位置。环境退化的人为来源包括为增加经济增长和福利而开展的发展活动。在二十世纪后期,工业化成为寻求现代化和增加人均收入的国家的发展道路。从事国际贸易的国家将其潜力扩展到了国内之外,从而达到了全球性和更丰富的市场。随着全球化成为经济发展的重要方面,肮脏产业增长加速的国家被视为加剧了诸如全球变暖,森林砍伐和资源枯竭等环境问题。有人认为,全球化导致污染密集型生产的扩大,从而对环境造成损害。;人们普遍认识到,国际贸易可以提高经济福利。接下来的问题是,如果生产是污染密集型的,国际贸易是否必然会对环境造成不利影响?有证据表明贸易对环境有利还是有害?;本文探讨了贸易参与有区别的,肮脏的商品的环境影响。第一篇论文名为“垄断竞争,贸易与环境”,提出了三种分析。首先,它为生产差异化,污染密集(或肮脏)商品的经济体开发了贸易和环境框架。结果表明,脏货的产生会导致三种环境影响,即规模,技术和选择效果。其次,它对环境政策变化对企业减排水平,产品价格,消费,生产规模和经济中企业数量的影响进行了比较静态分析。第三,它考察了贸易开放与环境之间的关系。产业内贸易的影响显示为规模,技术和选择效应的总和。在第二篇文章“产业内贸易与环境”中,对第一篇文章中开发的通用框架进行了修改,以允许替代弹性(CES)效用函数具有恒定的弹性。它明确表明,自由贸易不会导致有害的环境影响。比较静态分析表明,环境政策严格性的提高会产生负面的技术效应,并产生中性规模和选择效应。在第三篇文章中,“行业内贸易如何影响环境?”,使用面板数据方法测试了行业内以及行业间贸易的污染模型的综合理论预测。统计证据表明以下情况。首先,硫氧化物,氮氧化物和挥发性有机化合物的排放在选择,规模,技术和成分影响方面正在增加。其次,选择效应是估算国际贸易对排放水平的全部影响时的重要且相关的变量。第三,结果符合行业内和行业间贸易框架所生成数据的实现。第四也是最后,贸易的更大开放性或贸易自由化的增加导致排放水平的降低。

著录项

  • 作者

    Aralas, Sarma Binti.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Economics Environmental.;Economics Agricultural.;Economics Theory.;Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 199 p.
  • 总页数 199
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号