首页> 外文学位 >Common-pool resource with free mobility.
【24h】

Common-pool resource with free mobility.

机译:具有自由移动性的公共池资源。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Management and cooperation among users of natural resources such as extensive grazing lands, forests, and international fisheries are often characterized by free mobility of agents, i.e. production technologies spread across multiple locations. This work is motivated by the pastureland use practiced in Mongolia and presents insight on how free mobility of agents may affect resource management. We extend the research on the management of common-pool resource (CPR) to multiple communities where agents are free to choose their locality in which to extract resource. Here, we study the effects of the various institutions on the spatial distribution of agents in a two-locality economy. Our work focuses on two differing institutions: no regulation and sanctioning system previously studied in Casari and Plott (2003). When individuals are free to choose between two localities with and without sanctions, we ask whether a community with a sanctioning system can withstand the migratory pressure from outside. This study is comprised of both theoretical and experimental inquiry. It is organized in three chapters. Chapter 1 provides a theoretical model and characterizes the free mobility equilibrium using the notion of Tiebout equilibrium. We find that a decentralized management of CPR may sustain resource efficiency at a high level if the sanctioning system adjusts to the migration from the neighboring locality without sanctions. Moreover, a positive externality is captured by the neighboring unregulated locality. Chapter 2 was designed to test the prediction of the model using laboratory computerized experiments in the USA and Mongolia. The experimental data suggests that sanctioning is an effective tool in preventing free riding in a CPR setting even under free mobility. Partial monitoring was sufficient to reduce over-extraction. In addition, we observed interesting behavioral factors such as sorting of the population into different regimes and predation among participants in the unregulated locality. Chapter 3 provides methodological discussion on the differences between hand-run and computerized experiments using the data from both types of experiments conducted in Mongolia. Results in both settings are in line with theoretical predictions, yet the influence of social values is more obvious in the hand-run experiments.
机译:自然资源使用者(例如广阔的牧场,森林和国际渔业)之间的管理与合作通常以代理人的自由流动为特征,即生产技术分布在多个地方。这项工作是受蒙古国实践的牧场使用的激励,并提出了关于代理商的自由流动如何影响资源管理的见识。我们将对公共池资源(CPR)管理的研究扩展到多个社区,在这些社区中,代理可以自由选择提取资源的位置。在这里,我们研究了两地经济中各种制度对代理人空间分布的影响。我们的工作侧重于两个不同的机构:没有在Casari和Plott(2003)中研究过的监管和制裁系统。当个人在有制裁和无制裁的两个地方自由选择时,我们问一个有制裁制度的社区是否可以承受来自外部的迁徙压力。这项研究包括理论和实验探究。它分为三章。第1章提供了一个理论模型,并使用Tiebout平衡的概念来描述自由迁移率平衡。我们发现,如果制裁系统适应未经制裁的邻国迁移,对CPR的分散管理可以在较高水平上保持资源效率。而且,正外部性被相邻的不受管制的局部性捕获。第2章旨在使用美国和蒙古的实验室计算机实验来测试模型的预测。实验数据表明,即使在自由活动的情况下,制裁也是防止心肺复苏时搭便车的有效工具。部分监视足以减少过度提取。此外,我们观察到了有趣的行为因素,例如将人口分类为不同的政权,以及不受管制地区参与者之间的掠夺行为。第三章使用来自蒙古进行的两种实验的数据,对手工实验和计算机化实验之间的差异进行了方法论讨论。两种情况下的结果均与理论预测相符,但在人工实验中,社会价值的影响更为明显。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dorj, Dolgosuren.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Hawai'I at Manoa.;

  • 授予单位 University of Hawai'I at Manoa.;
  • 学科 Economics General.;Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 107 p.
  • 总页数 107
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号