首页> 外文学位 >On Foucault and the genealogy of governmentality.
【24h】

On Foucault and the genealogy of governmentality.

机译:论福柯与政府家谱。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation I perform what I take to be a genealogy of governmentality by tracing the history of governmentality through various political philosophers and culminating in the work of Michel Foucault.I begin with some examination of governmentality as it appears in the discursive space opened by Foucault's later work, in particular his History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. I then turn to an examination of Plato and Aristotle, looking at how some contemporary interlocutors have been governmental in their approach. I conclude the first chapter with a look at ideology and historical explanation.Next, I examine Machiavelli's The Prince, also in light of some current interlocutors, particularly Foucault and John Najemy. The purpose here is to see how Machiavelli may well have presaged some governmental space in his work and how others have utilized this space. I also address the dispute between Foucault and Derrida over Descartes as well as Foucault's insight into authorship and show how this all relates to Machiavelli and The Prince.The final chapter looks at Hobbes and Locke's approaches to governance, particularly as they apply to the governance of nature. I continue the strategy of looking at current interlocutors, paying close attention to some contemporary commentary on Locke. I also look at the nature of historical explanation, in particular the approach that involves utilizing the "covering-law" models of explanation. I close with some thoughts on how this sort of explanation fails from a Foucauldian perspective.
机译:在这篇论文中,我通过各种政治哲学家追溯政府性的历史,并最终完成米歇尔·福柯的工作,来完成我对政府性的谱系研究。首先,我对福柯的开放性话语空间中出现的政府性进行了一些考察。以后的工作,特别是他的《性历史》,第然后,我转向对柏拉图和亚里斯多德的考察,考察一些当代对话者如何管理他们的方法。在第一章结束时,我将讨论意识形态和历史解释。接下来,我还将根据目前的一些对话者,尤其是福柯和约翰·纳吉米,对马基雅维利的《王子》进行研究。这里的目的是了解马基雅维利如何在其工作中预见一些政府空间,以及其他人如何利用这一空间。我还讨论了福柯和德里达之间关于笛卡尔的争议以及福柯对作者身份的见解,并展示了这一切与马基雅维利和《王子》有何关系。性质。我将继续研究与现有对话者的策略,并密切关注有关洛克的当代评论。我还将研究历史解释的本质,特别是涉及利用“覆盖法”解释模型的方法。从福柯主义的角度来看,我对这种解释如何失败有一些想法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nichols, Alan.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Columbia.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Columbia.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 265 p.
  • 总页数 265
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号