首页> 外文学位 >Le concept phenomenologique de phenomene chez Heidegger. 'Sein und Zeit' et les 'Marburger Vorlesungen' de 1923 a 1926.
【24h】

Le concept phenomenologique de phenomene chez Heidegger. 'Sein und Zeit' et les 'Marburger Vorlesungen' de 1923 a 1926.

机译:现象学的概念海德格尔。 “ Sein und Zeit”读为1923年和1926年的“ Marburger Lectures”。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This doctoral dissertation deals with Heidegger's phenomenological concept of phenomenon, in Sein und Zeit and the Marburger Vorlesungen from 1923 to 1926.;Our study starts in Rein fund Zeta, paragraph 7. In this paragraph, Heidegger explicitly determines the concept of phenomenon, first formally, as what shows itself, but as it is not, Schein (¶ 7A), and then links this mode of showing with Being (¶ 7C). The Heidegger's affirmation according to which the phenomenon does not show itself (SuZ, 35) put forward by most commentators to support the thesis of the non-showing of the phenomenon, must be considered in the context settled by a reference to kantian transcendental philosophy (¶ 7A). The phenomenon does not show itself, that is, not in the same way that beings do; it shows itself at once and jointly with beings, but implicitly, and as it is not.;This interpretation finds support in two tasks assigned to phenomenology, as they deal with the problematic of the access to the thing itself. First, the ontological analytic of Dasein brings to the fore that Being shows itself together with the being designated for exam. Heidegger asserts it explicitly: the understanding of Being is already a positive phenomenon (SuZ, 5). Second, the destruction of the history of ontology reveals itself to be, initially, a task of appropriation, and then, a task of dismantling; its negative function, moreover, concerns only the present.;Our interpretation finds important additional support in the Marburg lectures that have prepared Sein und Zeit, as they reveal that the phenomenon is asserted from the start and persistently as Schein. During the winter semester 1923-1924, Heidegger speaks of a turnaround of the concept of phenomenon from what shows itself to what shows itself as it is not, under the effect of the facticity of language. In accordance with this discovery, the two following semesters (summer 1924 and winter 1924-1925) deal with the origin of falsity in language, falsity that reveals itself as Schein with particular eloquence in the Sophist lecture course. During the winter semester 1925-1926, Heidegger reiterates his concept of phenomenon as Schein by appropriating himself the kantian transcendentalism. The same concept is noticed during the summer semester of 1926, in the repetition of the discovery of Being from beings, which draw from Greek philosophy.;According to the most commonly accepted interpretation, the phenomenon is what does not show itself. This reading is accepted in France, in Germany as well as in the United States. In opposition to this interpretation, we defend that the phenomenon according to Digger is what shows itself, but what usually shows itself as it is not .;The understanding of the concept of phenomenon as Schein gives to phenomenology the sense Heidegger determined for it. The legitimation requirement proper to the method is reinforced, and the risk the philosopher sees to the enterprise of accessing the thing itself takes all its sense. Consequently, the entire project of Sein und Zeit takes on a new light.;Key words: philosophy, Heidegger, phenomenon, phenomenology, Sein und Zeit, Marburger Vorlesungen.
机译:该博士论文涉及海德格尔现象学的现象学概念,分别于1923年至1926年在Sein und Zeit和Marburger Vorlesungen中进行;我们的研究始于Rein基金Zeta,第7段。在这一段中,海德格尔首先正式地明确确定了现象的概念。 ,如其本身所显示的那样,而不是其本身,则是Schein(¶7A),然后将该显示方式与Being(¶7C)链接起来。对于大多数评论员所提出的不显示现象本身的海德格尔断言(SuZ,35),必须在提及康德先验哲学的背景下加以考虑(SuZ,35)。 ¶7A)。这种现象没有表现出来,也就是说,与众不同。它可以立即显示出来,并与众生一起显示自己,但是却隐含地显示出来,而不是显示出来。;这种解释在分配给现象学的两个任务中找到了支持,因为它们处理了对事物本身的获取的问题。首先,Dasein的本体论分析突显出存在与被指定为考试一起的自我。海德格尔明确宣称:对存在的理解已经是一种积极现象(SuZ,5)。其次,破坏本体论的历史表明,最初,它本身就是一项占用任务,然后是一项拆除任务。此外,我们的解释在准备Sein und Zeit的Marburg演讲中找到了重要的额外支持,因为它们揭示了现象从一开始就是断言,并一直是Schein。在1923-1924年冬季学期中,海德格尔谈到了在语言事实性的影响下,现象的概念从显示自我转变为显示非真实现象的转变。根据这一发现,随后的两个学期(1924年夏季和1924-1925年冬季)处理了语言虚假的起源,这种虚假在Sophist讲授课程中特别以口才表现为Schein。在1925-1926年冬季学期中,海德格尔通过采用康德先验主义来重申他的“申因”现象的概念。在1926年的夏季学期中,重复了从希腊哲学中汲取的“从众生中”的发现,发现了相同的概念。根据最普遍接受的解释,这种现象本身并没有表现出来。法国,德国和美国均接受此阅读。与这种解释相反,我们辩称,根据Digger的现象是显示自身的现象,但通常是按自身的形式显示自身的现象;对Schein现象概念的理解为现象学赋予了海德格尔为其确定的意义。适用于该方法的合法性要求得到了加强,而哲学家对访问事物本身的企业的风险承担了全部的责任。因此,《盛世时代》的整个项目有了新的亮点。关键词:哲学,海德格尔,现象,现象学,盛世时代,马尔堡·福勒森根。

著录项

  • 作者

    Basque, Tania.;

  • 作者单位

    Universite de Montreal (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 Universite de Montreal (Canada).;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 269 p.
  • 总页数 269
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:01

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号