首页> 外文学位 >An analysis of continuous improvement in lean enterprise and Six Sigma approaches.
【24h】

An analysis of continuous improvement in lean enterprise and Six Sigma approaches.

机译:精益企业和六西格码方法的持续改进分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Lean enterprise focuses on eliminating waste or non-value added activities. While six sigma targets reducing errors and variations. Both use continuous improvement and this research evaluates key continuous improvement characteristics that each approach recommends in regards to leadership, learning, and collaborating, but is often overlooked in execution. Are lean enterprise and six sigma approaches applied to drive continuous improvement? Phone interviews test this hypothesis across a population of 174 different automotive companies in nine industries. This research also evaluates these key characteristics to the methods used, benefits obtained, and industry features.;From the 86 participating companies, 60 companies did not use either lean or six sigma, while another 26 companies did and completed the full interview. Only 7.1% or 4 out of 57 companies with less than 100 to 249 employees used either approach. Participants that used lean or six sigma approaches appear to struggle with extending initiatives to include suppliers (56% or 15 out of 27) and getting employees involved and satisfied with approaches at all levels (53% or 14 out of 27), as well as other areas.;This research identifies several areas of weakness organizations experience in the execution of productivity improvement techniques, such as lean and six sigma, as well as proposes significant measures that need to be incorporated to improve the success of these approaches. Awareness with the results of this research needs to be incorporated into education and training programs, as well as these results can help prevent or improve upon the negative results that many companies have experienced with these approaches and offer some explanations on potentially why these issues occurred.
机译:精益企业致力于消除浪费或无附加值的活动。六个sigma目标减少了错误和变化。两者都使用持续改进,并且本研究评估了每种方法在领导力,学习和协作方面所建议的关键持续改进特征,但在执行过程中常常被忽略。是否采用精益企业和六个sigma方法来推动持续改进?电话采访在九个行业的174家不同汽车公司的人口中测试了这一假设。这项研究还评估了所用方法,获得的好处和行业特征的这些关键特征。从86家参与公司中,有60家公司未使用精益或六西格码,而另外26家公司则使用并完成了完整的采访。在雇员少于100至249人的57家公司中,只有7.1%或4家采用了这两种方法。使用精益或六西格玛方法的参与者似乎在努力扩展计划以包括供应商(27%中的56%或15),以及使员工参与并满意所有级别的方法(27%中的53%或14),以及这项研究确定了组织在执行生产力改进技术方面遇到的弱点领域,例如精益和六个西格玛,并提出了必须纳入的重要措施以改善这些方法的成功。必须将对这项研究结果的认识纳入教育和培训计划,并且这些结果可以帮助防止或改善许多公司在使用这些方法时所经历的负面结果,并就可能发生这些问题的原因提供一些解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Huehn-Brown, Wende J.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Rolla.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Rolla.;
  • 学科 Engineering Industrial.;Engineering System Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 197 p.
  • 总页数 197
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 一般工业技术;系统科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号