首页> 外文学位 >Public participation: Rhetoric or reality? An analysis of planning and management in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve.
【24h】

Public participation: Rhetoric or reality? An analysis of planning and management in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve.

机译:公众参与:修辞还是现实?对南达·德维生物圈保护区的规划和管理进行了分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Sustainable development has been advocated in response to environmental deterioration, including the loss of biodiversity. Traditional models of biodiversity conservation, such as protected areas, have been coupled with detrimental impacts to ecosystems and social systems. Consequently, protected areas have often been associated with rising levels of conflict between the civic sector and those making the decisions. Biosphere reserves have evolved out of a responsibility to resolve conflict by reconciling the needs of humans with the need to maintain ecological integrity and biodiversity. Effective planning and management are necessary to achieve the mandate of a biosphere reserve. Since government is typically the lead actor in planning and management for conservation, of particular importance to these processes are the roles, dynamics and processes pertaining to civic and private sector participation. Participatory approaches are seen as a key way to link conservation and sustainable development.; The purpose of this research then, was to investigate participation in planning and management activities in the Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve located in Uttaranchal, India. Given the history of conflict in the NDBR, studying the roles and the participation of these sectors is valuable for informing environmental policies and practices. The specific objectives were to: (1) describe the background and context of planning and management in the NDBR; (2) determine the roles of the public, private and civic sectors during selected planning and management activities; (3) describe what members in each of the sectors thought the roles were, and what the roles should be; (4) investigate the extent of civic and private sector participation in those activities; and, (5) evaluate the effectiveness of the participation.; The research design used a qualitative, exploratory, case study strategy to consider two empirical cases of participatory processes in a biosphere reserve context. Data collection methods included key informant analysis, informal semi-structured interviews, participant observation and the review of secondary data sources. Data collection was guided by a framework developed from attributes of public participation processes as indicated in the literature.; Centralized decision making for the establishment of both protected areas and biosphere reserves still persists in India. However, eco-development and microplanning have emerged as two government-initiated mechanisms that provide greater opportunity for the general public to have a role in conservation-related planning and management activities. The research findings include the identification of a wide variety of roles being played by the public sector in these processes, fewer roles being played by the civic sector and a minimal number of roles being played by the private sector. One important and positive outcome was that relationships had improved between the sectors involved in both processes.; In the first case study, two community-based Eco-Development Committees (EDCs) helped the state Forest and Wildlife Department carry out various management functions, particularly solid waste management. The results demonstrate that the EDCs had a central role in managing the solid waste and traffic along the trekking/pilgrimage route bypassing their villages. The cooperation of small private enterprises was an important factor in the EDCs' success. In addition, the EDCs were educating and informing others about the biodiversity in the valley. Civic and private sector involvement in decision making was minimal and accountability was lacking.; The second case considered a village-level planning process, referred to as microplanning. The village of Lata was selected to study this process because it had developed a village microplan in 2002 and was in the implementation phase. It was discovered that the people of Lata did have the opportunity to decide which developmental and conservati
机译:为了应对环境恶化,包括生物多样性的丧失,提倡可持续发展。传统的生物多样性保护模式,例如保护区,已经对生态系统和社会系统产生了有害影响。因此,保护​​区往往与公民部门与决策者之间的冲突加剧有关。生物圈保护区已经摆脱了通过调和人类需求与维持生态完整性和生物多样性的需求来解决冲突的责任。有效的规划和管理对于实现生物圈保护区的任务是必要的。由于政府通常是保护规划和管理的主要参与者,因此与公民和私营部门参与有关的角色,动态和过程对这些过程尤其重要。参与式方法被视为将保护与可持续发展联系起来的关键方法。当时,这项研究的目的是调查位于印度乌塔兰恰尔的南达·德维生物圈保护区对计划和管理活动的参与。鉴于NDBR的冲突历史,研究这些部门的作用和参与对于告知环境政策和实践非常有价值。具体目标是:(1)描述NDBR中计划和管理的背景和背景; (2)确定公共,私营和民间部门在选定的计划和管理活动中的作用; (3)描述每个部门的成员认为角色是什么,以及角色应该是什么; (4)调查公民和私营部门参与这些活动的程度; (5)评估参与的有效性。该研究设计采用了定性,探索性的案例研究策略,以考虑生物圈保护区背景下参与过程的两个经验案例。数据收集方法包括关键信息提供者分析,非正式的半结构化访谈,参与者观察以及对辅助数据源的审查。如文献所示,数据收集是根据从公众参与过程的属性发展而来的框架进行的。在印度,建立保护区和生物圈保护区的集中决策仍在继续。但是,生态发展和微计划已经成为两个政府发起的机制,为公众提供了更多机会在与保护相关的计划和管理活动中发挥作用。研究结果包括确定公共部门在这些过程中所扮演的各种各样的角色,公民部门所扮演的角色更少以及私人部门所扮演的角色数量最少。一个重要而积极的结果是,两个过程所涉及的部门之间的关系得到了改善。在第一个案例研究中,两个基于社区的生态发展委员会(EDC)帮助州森林和野生动物局执行各种管理职能,特别是固体废物管理。结果表明,EDC在管理绕过村庄的徒步旅行/朝圣路线上的固体废物和交通方面发挥着核心作用。小型私营企业的合作是EDC成功的重要因素。此外,EDC正在对山谷中的生物多样性进行教育并告知其他人。公民和私营部门参与决策的机会很少,缺乏问责制。第二种情况考虑了村庄一级的计划过程,称为微计划。之所以选择拉塔村来研究这一过程,是因为拉塔村在2002年制定了村级微观计划,目前处于实施阶段。人们发现拉塔人确实有机会决定哪个发展和保护区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Seaba, Natalie.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Manitoba (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Manitoba (Canada).;
  • 学科 Environmental Sciences.; Recreation.
  • 学位 M.N.R.M.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 173 p.
  • 总页数 173
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 环境科学基础理论;群众文化事业;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号