首页> 外文学位 >The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's paradigm shift: A grounded theory analysis of law enforcement officers' receptivity toward collaborative problem solving.
【24h】

The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife's paradigm shift: A grounded theory analysis of law enforcement officers' receptivity toward collaborative problem solving.

机译:华盛顿鱼类和野生动物部的范式转移:对执法人员对协作式问题解决的接受度的扎根理论分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation utilizes a grounded theory approach to understanding in the exploration of the opinions and attitudes of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) law enforcement officers' regarding their agency's effort to accomplish a "paradigm shift" toward collaborative problem solving to gain compliance with resource-protective regulations. While a laudable and timely goal, such a paradigm shift faces numerous internal and external barriers to successful implementation by the WDFW law enforcement division.; By way of general context, over a century of natural resource rule-making and regulation by the federal government has angered many citizens in the American West, and this resentment creates difficulties for the WDFW and similar natural resource regulatory agencies as they attempt to utilize collaboration in the field. Although the use of collaboration has been on the rise in the United States since the 1970s, it is generally not yet the preferred method of natural resource conflict resolution. Additionally, paradigm shifts of the sort being dealt with here in American law enforcement agencies have been historically difficult to implement. In recent history, the effort to implement community-oriented policing (COP) has been confronted by numerous internal obstacles---among the most important being officer resistance to change.; The 43 WDFW law enforcement officers interviewed for this research study revealed that there remains a general lack of rank-and-file commitment to make use of collaboration to resolve contentious natural resource problems on the part of the officers. This lack of commitment would seem to result from two principal sources: the current reward system does not give due recognition to officer efforts to use collaboration, and very little communication takes place between veteran and rookie officers concerning the utility of collaboration in natural resource law enforcement work. To the extent that the WDFW is typical of other natural resource regulatory agencies, the lessons learned from this research study should be of interest to the many other public agencies seeking to make the paradigm shift from feared "regulator" to a trustworthy "collaborative problem solver."
机译:本文采用扎实的理论方法来理解华盛顿鱼类和野生动物部(WDFW)执法人员在其机构为实现“范式转变”向合作问题解决以获取遵守的努力方面的观点和态度。资源保护法规。尽管这是一个值得称赞的及时目标,但这种模式转变面临着WDFW执法部门成功实施的众多内部和外部障碍。在一般情况下,一个世纪以来,联邦政府对自然资源的法规制定和监管激怒了美国西部的许多公民,这种怨恨为WDFW和类似的自然资源监管机构在尝试利用协作创造了困难。在该领域。尽管自1970年代以来,协作的使用在美国一直在增加,但它通常不是解决自然资源冲突的首选方法。另外,历史上很难在美国执法机构中处理这种范式转换。在最近的历史中,实施面向社区的警务(COP)的努力遇到了许多内部障碍,其中最重要的是军官对变革的抵制。接受本研究研究采访的43名WDFW执法人员透露,总体上仍然缺乏用协同合作解决官员有争议的自然资源问题的常规承诺。缺乏承诺似乎是由于两个主要原因造成的:当前的奖励制度并未充分认可军官使用协作的努力,而退伍军人与新手军官之间很少就合作在自然资源执法中的作用进行沟通工作。就WDFW在其他自然资源监管机构中是典型的而言,从本研究中吸取的教训应吸引许多其他公共机构的兴趣,这些机构试图将范式从担心的“监管者”转变为可信赖的“协作问题解决者” 。”

著录项

  • 作者

    Patten, Ryan.;

  • 作者单位

    Washington State University.;

  • 授予单位 Washington State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Forestry and Wildlife.; Political Science Public Administration.; Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 277 p.
  • 总页数 277
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 森林生物学;政治理论;法学各部门;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号