首页> 外文学位 >Venice in the east Adriatic: Experiences and experiments in colonial rule in Dalmatia and Istria (c. 1150--1358).
【24h】

Venice in the east Adriatic: Experiences and experiments in colonial rule in Dalmatia and Istria (c. 1150--1358).

机译:东亚得里亚海的威尼斯:达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉(Istria)殖民统治的经验和实验(约1150--1358)。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Dalmatia and Istria made up the kernel of Venice's empire, the first to enter and the last to leave its dominion. From the year 1000 onwards, the doges of Venice claimed to rule over the east Adriatic coast as well as over their own city-state. Initially, Venice relied upon the inconstant loyalties of the civic governments to enforce its policies in the Adriatic. Yet, starting around 1150, the doges began to appoint Venetian nobles as colonial rectors to govern its subject cities. These rectors provided the genesis of Venice's colonial administration in the east Adriatic. Over the course of the twelfth, thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the rectorships developed from semi-autonomous sinecures to bureaucratic offices. This study examines the ways in which the Venetian state and the rectors dealt with the difficulties of ruling a place that was geographically close but culturally different from the metropole. The inclusion of Dalmatia and Istria into the narrative of Venetian history ascribed a moral and military superiority to the Venetians. Yet, the frequent secession and rebellion of the cities of Dalmatia and Istria marred the vision of peaceful and willing union that Venice espoused. The frequent conflicts of interest between the state, the subject communes of Dalmatia and Istria and the rectors eventually resulted in increasingly better defined formulations of the rectorial office and the nature of Venetian rule. Conflicts between municipal offices in Venice and colonial rectors in Dalmatia and Istria remade boundaries between Venetian and foreign space, and directly involved the highest levels of Venetian government in colonial rule. The actions of rectors in diplomacy and arbitration not only solved disputes between Dalmatian and Istria subject communes, but also pointed towards the role of Venice in consolidating Dalmatia and Istria as unified regions under its rule. Both the Venetian state and the subject communes worked towards depersonalization of the rectorships, in which they transitioned from hereditary possessions to governmental offices. By examining these processes, this study reveals the evolution of Venetian ideology and methods of rule in the Adriatic, and its impact on both the colonizer and the colonized.
机译:达尔马提亚(Dalmatia)和伊斯特拉(Istria)构成了威尼斯帝国的核心,第一个进入威尼斯,最后一个离开威尼斯。从公元1000年开始,威尼斯的诸侯声称统治整个亚得里亚海东部沿海地区以及他们自己的城市国家。最初,威尼斯依靠公民政府的忠诚度来执行其在亚得里亚海的政策。然而,从1150年左右开始,总督开始任命威尼斯贵族为殖民统治者,以统治其目标城市。这些校长为威尼斯在亚得里亚海东部的殖民统治提供了起源。在十二,十三和十四世纪的过程中,管理职位从半自治的sinecures发展到官僚机构。这项研究探讨了威尼斯州和州长如何应对统治一个地理位置较近但文化上与大都市区不同的地方的困难。将达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉纳入威尼斯人的历史叙述,赋予威尼斯人以道义上和军事上的优势。然而,达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉城市的频繁分裂和叛乱破坏了威尼斯所拥护的和平和自愿联盟的愿景。国家,达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉的公社与大臣之间的频繁利益冲突,最终导致了对统治办公室和威尼斯统治本质的明确定义。威尼斯市政当局与达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉的殖民统治者之间的冲突重新确立了威尼斯与外国空间之间的界限,并直接将最高级别的威尼斯政府纳入殖民统治。外交官在外交和仲裁中的行动不仅解决了达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉主题公社之间的争端,而且还指出了威尼斯在巩固达尔马提亚和伊斯特拉作为其统治下的统一地区方面的作用。威尼斯国家和所属公社都致力于使人格调解人格化,在这种情况下,他们从世袭财产过渡到政府机构。通过研究这些过程,这项研究揭示了威尼斯意识形态和亚得里亚海统治方法的演变,以及它对殖民者和被殖民者的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号