首页> 外文学位 >Knowledge acquisition and creation in the portfolio of international strategic alliances.
【24h】

Knowledge acquisition and creation in the portfolio of international strategic alliances.

机译:国际战略联盟中的知识获取和创造。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

As opposed to dyadic levels of analyses, portfolios are thought to exhibit synergies and different evolutionary paths that can be qualified as portfolio effects. In this dissertation, I investigate whether firms can use their portfolios of strategic alliances to achieve competitive advantage through knowledge creation. I organize the thesis into three main papers. In the first paper, I suggest that technological diversity at the portfolio level, influences knowledge creation by firms both directly through a firm's ability to access knowledge from its portfolio and indirectly, through some of its alliance partners acting as bridges to the knowledge possessed by others. Interestingly firms who possess nonoverlapping knowledge bases compared to their portfolio do better on patenting in the biotechnology industry. Contrary to expectations, having a wide non-overlapping technological base in the alliance portfolio does not help focal firms create new knowledge. I also find mixed evidence of synergistic effects (which I measure as strength of the bridging mechanisms). In the second paper, I hypothesize (and find) that international market intensity in the portfolio of strategic alliances allow firms to learn from new country environments and new markets and improves the NPD (New Product Development) process of the firms (once technological capability is controlled for). The third paper explores how convergence and divergence in the technological base of an alliance portfolio, affects the stability of the portfolio itself. Findings suggest that whilst convergence and divergence may happen simultaneously, but have no interactive effect on portfolio turnover. However, relative convergence leads to portfolio instability, confirming the competitive, and not cooperative nature of strategic alliances in this industry.
机译:与二元分析水平相反,投资组合被认为具有协同作用和不同的演化路径,可以被视为投资组合效应。在本文中,我研究了企业是否可以利用其战略联盟的投资组合通过知识创造获得竞争优势。我将论文分为三篇主要论文。在第一篇论文中,我建议投资组合层面的技术多样性会直接通过公司从其投资组合中获取知识的能力,以及通过其某些联盟伙伴充当其他人拥有的知识的桥梁而间接影响公司的知识创造。有趣的是,与投资组合相比,拥有不重叠知识基础的公司在生物技术行业的专利方面做得更好。与期望相反,联盟投资组合中拥有广泛的非重叠技术基础并不能帮助重点企业创造新知识。我还发现了协同效应的混合证据(我将其衡量为桥接机制的强度)。在第二篇论文中,我假设(并发现)战略联盟投资组合中的国际市场强度可以使企业从新的国家环境和新市场中学习,并改善企业的NPD(新产品开发)流程(一旦技术能力达到控制)。第三篇论文探讨了联盟投资组合的技术基础中的趋同与分歧如何影响投资组合本身的稳定性。研究结果表明,虽然趋同和趋同可能同时发生,但对投资组合周转率没有交互作用。但是,相对趋同导致投资组合不稳定,从而确认了该行业战略联盟的竞争性而非合作性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Manrakhan, Shalini Neema.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 118 p.
  • 总页数 118
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号