首页> 外文学位 >Online hate speech regulation in the United States and Europe: Accommodating conflicting legal paradigms.
【24h】

Online hate speech regulation in the United States and Europe: Accommodating conflicting legal paradigms.

机译:美国和欧洲的在线仇恨言论监管:适应冲突的法律范式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation deals with online hate speech regulation in an international context. It tries to assess how the legal paradigms regarding hate speech in the United States and Europe have been affected by the rise of the Internet. Secondly, it also deals with the more general issue of how countries can regulate content on the Internet that is illegal within their borders, but legal in the country of origin. European countries have very strict hate speech laws, while the United States' First Amendment protects most forms of hate speech. As a result of this situation, European countries and institutions have attempted to regulate hate speech originating from the United States. This work analyses and evaluates these attempts based on a normative framework and formulates suggestions for approaching this issue.; The first chapter of this work provides an in depth discussion of hate speech law in the United States. The second chapter discusses how this legal framework has been translated to the online environment. Chapters three and four follow the same outline when discussing European hate speech law. European hate speech law and its underpinnings are discussed in chapter three. The focus is on explaining the ideals and beliefs underpinning European hate speech law, specifically in contrast with the American approach, rather than on giving an in depth account of European codes and jurisprudence. Chapter four discusses the various attempts of European courts and governments to apply their strict hate speech laws to Internet content.; In chapter five, a normative framework to evaluate such attempts is proposed. This normative framework is based on three basic principles: regulation should be effective, should respect the layered mature of the Internet and should be grounded in a representative concept of sovereignty. Chapter six applies this normative framework to evaluate some possible methods available to Europe to fight hate speech online. This section contains some suggestions, based on the normative framework from chapter five, for how European nations could best enforce their hate speech laws online.
机译:本文的研究对象是国际背景下的网上仇恨言论监管。它试图评估互联网兴起如何影响美国和欧洲有关仇恨言论的法律范式。其次,它还涉及一个更笼统的问题,即各国如何监管其边界内非法但在原籍国合法的互联网内容。欧洲国家有非常严格的仇恨言论法律,而美国的《第一修正案》则保护大多数形式的仇恨言论。由于这种情况,欧洲国家和机构已试图规范源自美国的仇恨言论。这项工作基于规范框架分析和评估了这些尝试,并提出了解决该问题的建议。这项工作的第一章深入讨论了美国的仇恨言论法。第二章讨论了如何将此法律框架转换为在线环境。第三章和第四章在讨论欧洲仇恨言论法时遵循相同的大纲。第三章讨论了欧洲仇恨言论法及其基础。重点在于解释支持欧洲仇恨言论法的理想和信念,特别是与美国的做法形成鲜明对比的是,而不是深入介绍欧洲法规和法学。第四章讨论了欧洲法院和政府将其严格的仇恨言论法律应用于互联网内容的各种尝试。第五章提出了评估此类尝试的规范框架。该规范框架基于三个基本原则:监管应有效,应尊重互联网的分层成熟,并应以具有代表性的主权概念为基础。第六章运用该规范框架来评估欧洲可用于对抗网上仇恨言论的一些可能方法。本部分基于第五章的规范框架,针对欧洲国家如何最好地在线实施其仇恨言论法律提出了一些建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vanacker, Bastiaan Hugo.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Minnesota.;

  • 授予单位 University of Minnesota.;
  • 学科 Law.; Political Science International Law and Relations.; Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 313 p.
  • 总页数 313
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 法律;国际法;传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号