首页> 外文学位 >Catch and release: Expansion, contraction, and the downsizing of states.
【24h】

Catch and release: Expansion, contraction, and the downsizing of states.

机译:捕获和释放:扩展,收缩和状态缩减。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation asks two questions about secession. First, what explains the proliferation of states and secessionist movements in the post-1945 period? Second, when do governments fight to prevent secessionist movements from forming an independent state? None of the existing research addresses these puzzles in their entirety. One of the chief gaps in the literature is an account of how governments balance external security concerns with domestic demands for independence.;My central argument is that the international environment has altered the costs and benefits of holding territory, but it is the internal structure of states that governs how they downsize. Just as competitive pressures in the 19th and early 20th centuries compelled states to expand and secure territory and economic resources, changing security and economic conditions in the post-1945 period have led to an unwinding of that process as numerous states have chosen to contract and permit the secession of peripheral regions. But while the international system has rendered secession more likely, it is the internal characteristics of states that govern how they downsize. First, states have to beware lest the release of one unit sets a precedent for others and risks a cascade of further secessionism. I argue that the internal organization of states matters and that governments rely on notions of administrative rank when determining which groups can secede without fear of setting a precedent, and who they must fight in order to maintain a credible reputation. Second, democracies are more likely to permit secession provided the attempt is made through non-violent and institutional means.;To evaluate this argument, I collected original data on internal administrative units (proto-states) and secessionist movements over the period 1816-2005. I then tested my hypotheses in a mixed-methods approach using quantitative analysis and case studies on three countries: England, Russia, and India.
机译:本文提出了关于分裂国家的两个问题。首先,什么解释了1945年后时期国家和分裂主义运动的泛滥?第二,政府何时为防止分裂主义运动形成独立国家而斗争?现有的研究都没有整体解决这些难题。文献中的主要空白之一是关于政府如何平衡外部安全问题与国内对独立的需求之间的关系。我的中心论点是,国际环境已经改变了控制领土的成本和收益,但这是国家的内部结构。规定了他们如何缩小尺寸的状态。就像19世纪和20世纪初的竞争压力迫使各州扩大并确保领土和经济资源一样,1945年后时期不断变化的安全和经济状况也导致这一进程不复存在,因为许多州都选择签约并允许周边地区的分裂。但是,尽管国际体系使分裂的可能性更大,但国家的内部特征却决定着国家如何缩小规模。首先,各国必须提防以免释放一个单位为其他国家开创先例,并冒着进一步分裂的风险。我认为,国家内部组织很重要,政府在确定哪些团体可以脱离而不必担心树立先例时必须依靠行政级别的概念,以及为维护信誉而必须与谁战斗。其次,如果通过非暴力和体制手段进行尝试,民主国家更可能允许分裂国家。为了评估这一论点,我收集了1816-2005年间内部行政单位(原始国家)和分裂主义运动的原始数据。 。然后,我使用定量分析和案例研究,在三个国家(英国,俄罗斯和印度)以混合方法检验了我的假设。

著录项

  • 作者

    Griffiths, Ryan D.;

  • 作者单位

    Columbia University.;

  • 授予单位 Columbia University.;
  • 学科 History Modern.;Political Science General.;Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 336 p.
  • 总页数 336
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号