首页> 外文学位 >Multi-objective highway alignment optimization.
【24h】

Multi-objective highway alignment optimization.

机译:多目标公路路线优化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The highway alignment optimization algorithms available at present use the total cost as the objective function. The travel time cost, vehicle operating cost, accident cost, earthwork cost, land acquisition cost, and pavement and construction costs are the basic components of the total cost. This is a single-objective optimization approach and it has limited capability in considering cost component with different units. This approach uses the information of environmental impact, socioeconomic impact, impacts on historic sites and other sensitive areas in the total cost by transforming them to monetary values. It has limitation in yielding a set of alternatives with different level of trade-off among the objective values. Moreover, this process cannot yield a set of alternative solutions from a single execution of the method. The dissertation presents a multi-objective approach to overcome these shortcomings.;Analyzing different cost components and objectives for highway alignment optimization, it is observed that depending on the study area, some of the obtained alignments may be conflicting in nature, i.e., minimizing one cost component or objective value may yield an alignment with higher cost component or objective values. This leads to the study of the alternatives that might be obtained by trade-off among different cost components and other objective values. The multi-objective optimization has the potential to yield a set of alternatives with trade-off option. Generally, a Pareto-optimal front is designed to examine the trade-offs among two different objectives.;In the available highway alignment optimization approach, Points of Intersections (PIs) are considered as the decision variables. The highway alignment objectives depend on factors such as traffic growth, study area, and economic indices, which makes it difficult to represent them as an explicit function of the desired decision variables. To add to the complexity, the cost components and objectives are not continuous within the search space. Available multi-objective optimization algorithms do not address this issue. Therefore, there is a need to develop a multi-objective optimization algorithm that can efficiently and effectively optimize problems such as highway alignment optimization.;In this research, Genetic Algorithm (GA) based multi-objective optimization algorithms are specially developed for highway alignment design and optimization. This will have the capability to yield a set of trade-off alternatives. Mathematical formulations are developed to estimate the non-monetary objective values. The efficiency of generation of alternatives depends on the genetic algorithm reproduction operators. A special set of reproduction operators are also developed for this research work. All these formulation and estimation processes are computer coded in C and Avenue to obtain the alternatives. Effectiveness of the developed methodology is ensured by application of the multi-objective highway alignment optimization model to problems with discrete search domain and objective functions with indirect decision variables. Also, the developed model has the ability to converge to a Pareto-optimal front for two objectives. The trade-offs among individual objectives and cost components are analyzed through extensive sensitivity analysis. The Pareto-optimal front is a tool to graphically represent trade-offs for two objectives, but fails for more than two objectives. Therefore, effective representation of multi-objectives will also be pursued in this research work.;Keywords. Multi-objective optimization, highway alignment optimization, genetic algorithms, environmental impact, economic impact, social impact, geographical information system (GIS) database.
机译:当前可用的公路路线优化算法将总成本用作目标函数。行程时间成本,车辆运营成本,事故成本,土方成本,土地征用成本以及路面和建筑成本是总成本的基本组成部分。这是一种单目标优化方法,在考虑具有不同单位的成本成分时能力有限。该方法通过将环境影响,社会经济影响,对历史古迹和其他敏感区域的影响等信息转换为货币价值来使用这些信息。它在产生一组在目标值之间具有不同折衷水平的替代方案方面具有局限性。而且,该过程不能通过该方法的单次执行产生一组替代解决方案。本论文提出了一种克服这些缺点的多目标方法。通过分析不同的成本成分和公路路线优化的目标,可以发现,根据研究区域的不同,某些路线可能在本质上存在冲突,即尽量减少一条路线。成本要素或目标价值可能会与更高的成本要素或目标价值保持一致。这导致对替代方案的研究,这些替代方案可能是通过在不同的成本要素和其他目标值之间进行折衷获得的。多目标优化有可能产生具有权衡选择的一组备选方案。通常,设计帕累托最优前沿来检查两个不同目标之间的权衡。在可用的高速公路路线优化方法中,将交叉点(PI)视为决策变量。公路路线目标取决于交通增长,研究区域和经济指标等因素,因此很难将其表示为所需决策变量的明确函数。更复杂的是,成本要素和目标在搜索空间中并不连续。可用的多目标优化算法无法解决此问题。因此,有必要开发一种能够有效地优化高速公路路线优化等问题的多目标优化算法。本研究中,专门针对公路路线设计开发了基于遗传算法(GA)的多目标优化算法。和优化。这将具有产生一系列折衷方案的能力。开发数学公式以估计非货币目标值。替代方案的产生效率取决于遗传算法的复制算子。还为这项研究工作开发了一套特殊的复制操作员。所有这些公式化和估算过程均使用C和Avenue进行计算机编码,以获取替代方案。通过将多目标公路路线优化模型应用于离散搜索域和具有间接决策变量的目标函数的问题,可以确保所开发方法的有效性。同样,开发的模型具有收敛到两个目标的帕累托最优阵线的能力。通过广泛的敏感性分析来分析各个目标和成本构成之间的权衡。帕累托最优前沿是一种以图形方式表示两个目标的取舍的工具,但对于两个以上目标却无法实现。因此,在这项研究工作中还将追求多目标的有效表示。多目标优化,高速公路路线优化,遗传算法,环境影响,经济影响,社会影响,地理信息系统(GIS)数据库。

著录项

  • 作者

    Maji, Avijit.;

  • 作者单位

    Morgan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Morgan State University.;
  • 学科 Engineering Civil.
  • 学位 D.Eng.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 建筑科学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号